DOJ-OGR-00010442.jpg
671 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
4
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
671 KB
Summary
This legal document, part of a court filing from June 15, 2022, argues against applying a sentencing enhancement for 'undue influence'. The text asserts that the evidence does not support the claim that a witness named Carolyn was unduly influenced by Epstein or Ms. Maxwell. To support this, it cites Carolyn's own testimony that she actively sought out massage appointments, recruited other minors for money, and refused offers to travel to Epstein's island, indicating her actions were voluntary.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane | Witness/Victim |
Mentioned as someone for whom there is no evidence of engaging in a commercial sex act, in the context of arguing aga...
|
| Annie Farmer | Witness/Victim |
Mentioned as someone for whom there is no evidence of engaging in a commercial sex act, in the context of arguing aga...
|
| Carolyn | Witness/Victim |
A central figure in the argument that she was not 'unduly influenced' to provide sexualized massages to Epstein. Her ...
|
| Epstein | Recipient of services/Alleged perpetrator |
Carolyn provided sexualized massages to him. The document argues he did not unduly influence her.
|
| Virginia Roberts | Recruiter/Facilitator |
Mentioned as the person who initially offered Carolyn the opportunity to massage Epstein.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Alleged perpetrator/Associate of Epstein |
The document argues she did not unduly influence Carolyn, and that the record does not support the conclusion that sh...
|
| Patterson | Party in a cited legal case |
Mentioned in the case citation 'United States v. Patterson'.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States | government agency |
Mentioned as a party in the legal case citation 'United States v. Patterson'.
|
| 7th Cir. | court |
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, cited in 'United States v. Patterson, 576 F.3d 431, 443 (...
|
Timeline (4 events)
Virginia Roberts offered Carolyn the opportunity to massage Epstein.
Carolyn testified that she refused offers from Epstein and Ms. Maxwell to travel with them to Epstein's island.
Epstein's island
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as a location Carolyn refused offers to travel to with Epstein and Ms. Maxwell.
|
Relationships (4)
Virginia Roberts initially offered Carolyn the opportunity to massage Epstein.
Carolyn provided sexualized massages to Epstein for money. She sought him out for work and returned to him after becoming pregnant to earn money.
The document argues Ms. Maxwell did not unduly influence Carolyn. Carolyn refused offers from 'them' (implying Maxwell and Epstein) to travel to Epstein's island.
Carolyn 'recruited other minors to perform sexualized massages to make more money.'
Key Quotes (4)
"unduly influenc[ing] a minor to engage in prohibited sexual conduct."Source
— Legal document/statute
(Describing a concept already included in Counts Three, Four, and Six.)
DOJ-OGR-00010442.jpg
Quote #1
"a participant otherwise unduly influenced a minor to engage in a commercial sex act."Source
— USSG § 2G1.1(b)(4)(B) (2003)
(Quoting the 2003 Guidelines for a two-point sentencing enhancement.)
DOJ-OGR-00010442.jpg
Quote #2
"a participant’s influence over the minor compromised the voluntariness of the minor’s behavior."Source
— USSG § 2G1.3(b)(2)(B), Appl. Note 3(B)
(Defining when the 'undue influence' enhancement applies.)
DOJ-OGR-00010442.jpg
Quote #3
"[T]he defining characteristic of undue influence is that it involves a situation where the influencer has succeeded in altering the behavior of the target."Source
— United States v. Patterson, 576 F.3d 431, 443 (7th Cir. 2009)
(Quoting a legal precedent to define 'undue influence'.)
DOJ-OGR-00010442.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document