DOJ-OGR-00009321.jpg

432 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 432 KB
Summary

This court transcript excerpt details the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Brune, who is an officer of the court. She is questioned about her ethical obligations regarding juror misconduct and a specific conversation on May 12, 2011, with Theresa Trzaskoma. The conversation concerned whether a juror who sent a note with legal terms was a lawyer previously identified through a Google search.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Brune Witness / Officer of the court
The individual being questioned under direct examination.
Theresa Trzaskoma
A person with whom Ms. Brune had a discussion about a juror on May 12, 2011.
Juror No. 1 Juror
The subject of information discussed between Ms. Brune and Ms. Trzaskoma.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Court Government agency
Mentioned throughout as the entity to which Ms. Brune has ethical obligations.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.

Timeline (2 events)

2011-05-12
A discussion between Ms. Brune and Theresa Trzaskoma about information potentially related to Juror No. 1.
Direct examination of Ms. Brune regarding her ethical obligations and knowledge of potential juror information.
Court
Brune Unnamed Questioner

Relationships (1)

Brune Professional Theresa Trzaskoma
The document states they had a discussion on May 12, 2011, about a juror and a note sent during a trial, indicating they were colleagues involved in the same legal matter.

Key Quotes (2)

"I don't agree with your characterization. I had an ethical obligation to bring whatever material that I thought was accurate to the Court and that's what I tried to do throughout the trial."
Source
— Brune (In response to a question about her obligation to promptly disclose information suggesting juror misconduct.)
DOJ-OGR-00009321.jpg
Quote #1
"I don't think that I received significant information, but I did have a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma about the note, which was at that point new to us."
Source
— Brune (Responding to a question about receiving significant information related to Juror No. 1 on May 12, 2011.)
DOJ-OGR-00009321.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document