DOJ-OGR-00005852.jpg
675 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
675 KB
Summary
This legal document argues that the photo identification of a defendant by 'Minor Victim-4' was valid and not suggestive. It establishes that the victim had prior personal knowledge of the defendant from interactions between 2001 and 2004, and that the photo identification procedure was conducted cautiously. The document refutes the defense's claim that the defendant's photo was unduly suggestive because it looked like a 'mug shot' or was different from the others.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Minor Victim-4 | Victim |
A victim who identified the defendant from a photo book, based on prior personal interactions.
|
| Stallings | Party in a cited case |
Mentioned in the case citation 'Stallings v. Wood'.
|
| Wood | Party in a cited case |
Mentioned in the case citation 'Stallings v. Wood'.
|
| defendant | Defendant |
The subject of the legal proceedings, who was identified by Minor Victim-4.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| E.D.N.Y. | Government agency |
Appears in a case citation, referring to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2001-2004
Minor Victim-4 and the defendant met in person and interacted multiple times.
2007, 2009, 2020, and 2021
Minor Victim-4 mentioned the defendant by description or by name.
Minor Victim-4 was shown a photo book with 20 photos and identified a photo of the defendant.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in a case citation, referring to the Eastern District of New York.
|
Relationships (1)
The document states they 'met in person and interacted multiple times between 2001 and 2004'.
Key Quotes (2)
"looks like a mug shot"Source
— the defense
(An argument made by the defense that the defendant's photo was suggestive.)
DOJ-OGR-00005852.jpg
Quote #1
"is different than the others."Source
— the defense
(An argument made by the defense that the defendant's photo was suggestive because it stood out from the others in the photo array.)
DOJ-OGR-00005852.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document