DOJ-OGR-00020069.jpg
721 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
721 KB
Summary
This page from a legal document details a court's decision to detain a defendant before trial, finding that electronic monitoring would be insufficient and dismissing concerns about COVID-19 risks. The document then outlines the applicable legal standard under the Bail Reform Act, explaining the government's burden to prove the defendant is a flight risk and the factors a court must consider.
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judicial body |
Mentioned as the body that concluded monitoring would be insufficient, rejected defense arguments, and ordered the de...
|
| Government | Government agency |
Mentioned as the party that bears the burden of proving a defendant is a flight risk under the Bail Reform Act.
|
| United States | Government |
Mentioned as the plaintiff in the cited cases 'United States v. Boustani' and 'United States v. Sabhani'.
|
Relationships (2)
The document describes a legal proceeding where the Government is seeking to detain the defendant against the arguments of the defense.
The Court is the judicial body making rulings on the defendant's detention status.
Key Quotes (4)
"would be insufficient"Source
— the Court
(The Court's conclusion regarding the effectiveness of electronic monitoring and home security guards for the defendant.)
DOJ-OGR-00020069.jpg
Quote #1
"[t]he Government bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence both that the defendant ‘presents an actual risk of flight’ and that ‘no condition or combination of conditions could be imposed on the defendant that would reasonably assure his presence in court.’"Source
— United States v. Boustani (quoting United States v. Sabhani)
(Describing the legal standard and burden of proof on the Government when seeking detention based on flight risk.)
DOJ-OGR-00020069.jpg
Quote #2
"character . . . [and] financial resources."Source
— 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)
(Cited as part of the history and characteristics of the defendant that must be considered in a detention analysis.)
DOJ-OGR-00020069.jpg
Quote #3
"no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the person as required . . . such judicial officer shall order the detention of the person before trial."Source
— 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(1)
(The legal finding required for a judicial officer to order pretrial detention.)
DOJ-OGR-00020069.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document