DOJ-OGR-00009376.jpg

401 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

7
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 401 KB
Summary

This document is a transcript of a redirect examination in a legal proceeding, filed on February 24, 2022. A witness named Brune is questioned about why they did not investigate an individual further, despite a Westlaw report indicating she was a suspended attorney. The witness explains their belief that the report had conflated two different people with the same name, and they were convinced the person in question was a 'Bronxville stay-at-home wife' and not the lawyer.

People (7)

Name Role Context
Brune Witness
Person being questioned on redirect examination.
Unnamed Witness Witness
The person answering questions, designated as 'A'. Believed to be Brune.
Unnamed Questioner Attorney/Examiner
The person asking questions, designated as 'Q'.
Unnamed immigration judge's father Father of an immigration judge
Mentioned in an email discussed during the testimony.
Unnamed immigration judge Immigration Judge
Mentioned in an email discussed during the testimony.
Unnamed suspended lawyer Suspended Lawyer
A person whose license status is referenced in a report, who the witness believes is a different person from the subj...
Unnamed Bronxville stay-at-home wife Stay-at-home wife
The person the witness was convinced the subject of inquiry was, as opposed to the suspended lawyer.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
New York State Office of Court Administration Government agency
Source of information on page 11 of a document, regarding an attorney's license status.
Westlaw Company
Source of a report dated May 12th that is a subject of the questioning.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.

Timeline (3 events)

2022-02-24
Redirect examination of a witness named Brune, as recorded in a court transcript.
Unknown, on or around May 12th
A Westlaw report was available on May 12th, which the questioner suggests should have prompted an investigation.
Unknown, prior to the main testimony
Cross-examination of the witness, during which they testified they didn't think there was anything to investigate about a certain person.

Locations (2)

Location Context
Mentioned as part of the 'New York State Office of Court Administration'.
Location of the 'stay-at-home wife' the witness believed the subject to be.

Relationships (1)

Unnamed Questioner Professional Brune
The document is a transcript of a formal legal questioning (redirect examination) of the witness (Brune) by an examiner.

Key Quotes (1)

"I didn't, but I have to say that I don't believe it would have changed what happened here. By that I mean that this thing to me, without having any particular expertise in these things, looks like it mushed two people with the same name together. I was convinced that she was the Bronxville stay-at-home wife and not the suspended lawyer."
Source
— A (Witness Brune) (Explaining why seeing a Westlaw report about a suspended attorney would not have prompted an investigation, as the witness believed it was a case of mistaken identity.)
DOJ-OGR-00009376.jpg
Quote #1

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document