Unnamed witness
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Leopold
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Hayley
|
Friend |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Haley Robson
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror No. 93
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Pauley
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Steven Lavelle
|
Past association |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Leopold
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim abuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Conrad
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Theresa Trzaskoma
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
your Honor
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Her father
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. OKULA
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Haley Robson
|
Recruiter recruit |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | FBI Meeting | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Prior testimony given by a witness with a criminal record. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness testimony regarding civil suit discussions. | Unknown room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged sexual encounters involving Jeffrey Epstein (massages, oral sex, intercourse). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Massage | Jeff gave the witness a massage and asked how old they were. | upstairs | View |
| N/A | Meeting | The first meeting between the witness and Jeff. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Shopping trip | Hayley bought a purse at Marshall's. | Marshall's | View |
| N/A | Witness testimony | A witness testified about being in "group sexualized massages" or "orgies" involving Epstein and ... | Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | Trip | A witness described multiple visits to Epstein's house for massages which escalated into sexual a... | Epstein's house/residence | View |
| N/A | Conversation | The witness and their aunt discussed a lawsuit. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Questioning under oath | An unnamed witness was asked under oath about who was involved in her trafficking or sexual abuse... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Police incident | A Florida police report details the witness being dropped off by a local drug dealer at 5:45 a.m.... | Florida | View |
| N/A | Police incident | The witness was found by police in an inappropriate place after running away from home. | Georgia | View |
| N/A | Grand jury | A scheduled grand jury, four days before which the witness allegedly changed her story about her ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Personal conflict | The witness's father kicked her out of his home. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trip | The witness went to Epstein's house. | Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | Admission to facility | The witness was admitted to a juvenile educational facility. | juvenile educational facility | View |
| N/A | Sexual encounter | The witness states she had her first sexual intercourse at age 14. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Alleged incident | An alleged incident of physical contact between an unnamed witness and Mr. Epstein. | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Legal testimony | A witness testified before a Grand Jury when they were 14 or 15 years old. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Transportation | The witness's dad drove them to the Grand Jury testimony. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court appearance | An unnamed witness has a court appearance scheduled for an upcoming Monday. | unspecified court | View |
| N/A | Flight | An unnamed witness is scheduled to get on a plane on an upcoming Monday night. | unspecified | View |
| N/A | Encounter | An encounter between the witness and Mr. Epstein where he allegedly asked her to massage him and ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Relocation | The witness moved to Arizona. | Arizona | View |
EFTA00038018.pdf
An email from an FBI Special Agent in the Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking unit requesting approval for international travel in September 2020. The agent, a colleague, and two AUSAs from SDNY intend to interview an 'important witness' in the Epstein/Maxwell investigation who is currently abroad and uncomfortable providing a full statement via video. The trip was originally scheduled for March 2020 but was delayed due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
EFTA00037921.pdf
An email dated September 4, 2019, discussing the logistics of transferring 'Epstein message pad scans' to the Southern District of New York (SDNY) AUSA's office. The sender emphasizes the need to have the large files downloaded to a disc or hard drive prior to a witness proffer scheduled for the following week.
EFTA00035773.pdf
This document is a Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (OIG) waiver form dated August 29, 2019. An unnamed employee signed the form agreeing to provide voluntary information for an investigation explicitly described as 'Investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and any employee misconduct at the MCC' (Metropolitan Correctional Center). The form was signed at SDNY (Southern District of New York) at 9:35 AM.
EFTA00032879.pdf
This document contains a series of email exchanges between Assistant U.S. Attorneys from the Southern District of New York and their supervisors, requesting travel approval for the 'United States v. Epstein' investigation (Case ID 2018R01618). The emails, spanning from March 2019 to February 2020, detail planned trips to West Palm Beach, Los Angeles, Pensacola, and Stockholm for the purpose of interviewing witnesses and victims. The requests consistently reference the investigation into the 'enticement of minors for sexual activity' and seek approval for flights and hotel conference rooms.
EFTA00019451.pdf
This document is an email dated November 20, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding witness travel for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The email attaches a travel request form for a male witness who is scheduled to testify under a pseudonym.
EFTA00016831.pdf
This document is an email dated January 30, 2020, from an unknown sender to a recipient at USANYS regarding a travel request for a fact witness in the Epstein case. The witness, a male located in Florida, was required to fly to New York on February 6, 2020, for grand jury preparation scheduled for February 7, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00017960.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio. The questioning attorney establishes the witness's expertise in neuropsychology, confirms they are not a toxicologist, and begins to probe the relationship between memory and delayed disclosure.
DOJ-OGR-00008341.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on December 10, 2021. The Judge ('The Court') is discussing jury instructions regarding a specific witness involved in sexual conduct in New Mexico. The Judge notes that while the witness was above the age of consent in New Mexico, the government is using the evidence to prove enticement for illegal acts in New York, and the jury instructions must accurately reflect this legal distinction without favoring the government's arguments.
DOJ-OGR-00008318.jpg
This court transcript from December 10, 2021, captures a discussion where attorney Ms. Moe informs the court of a potential conflict of interest. Ms. Moe explains that prospective Juror No. 93 is an attorney at the same financial institution where a key trial witness is an executive director, and that this issue has also been flagged for the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00020913.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 28, 2023, detailing a procedural argument between counsel. Government counsel Ms. Moe pushes for a quick, by-Friday deadline for a post-trial briefing on an issue concerning Juror 50's testimony. Opposing counsel Ms. Sternheim argues for a two-week extension, citing the issue's importance and an upcoming trial she is starting on the 16th. The judge acknowledges the issue's significance but appears to favor a more expedited schedule.
DOJ-OGR-00018756.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a procedural discussion between the Court, Ms. Menninger, and Mr. Rohrbach regarding deadlines for submitting briefs and the results of a factual investigation concerning a male witness. The text also addresses a conflict where the defense has moved to preclude this witness's testimony while simultaneously holding him under a defense subpoena.
DOJ-OGR-00018463.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument between defense attorney Ms. Sternheim and the Court regarding the admissibility of evidence—specifically an email—under the doctrine of 'past recollection recorded.' The Judge questions what specific details the witness failed to recall that would necessitate admitting the prior record.
DOJ-OGR-00018409.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a sidebar discussion regarding '3500 material' where a prosecutor argues for the right to ask redirect questions about a witness's history as a domestic violence victim if defense attorney Ms. Sternheim raises the issue. The judge agrees, the witness is recalled, and the jury is brought back in.
DOJ-OGR-00018408.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a sidebar discussion where a judge rules to exclude evidence of a single sexual harassment allegation due to a lack of a pattern or proffer of falsity. Following the ruling, two attorneys, Ms. Pomerantz and Ms. Sternheim, discuss a planned line of questioning for a witness. Ms. Sternheim clarifies her intent is not to ask about the witness's ex-husband, but rather to ask if the witness had requested a friend to plant drugs on the father of her child.
DOJ-OGR-00018365.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It portrays the Judge instructing the jury that the current witness is not a victim of the crimes charged in the indictment and that testimony regarding sexual conduct with Jeffrey Epstein should not be used to judge the character or propensity of Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell. Additionally, the Judge orders courtroom sketch artists not to draw the exact likeness of witnesses testifying under pseudonyms to protect their anonymity.
DOJ-OGR-00016904.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely US v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger argues regarding the admissibility of evidence concerning Jeffrey Epstein's lease violations and residency at a specific property in late 1995 and early 1996. She references a witness hired in December 1995 who confirmed Epstein was not living at the property for the first three weeks of his employment.
DOJ-OGR-00016882.jpg
This page is a transcript from a court proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely Ghislaine Maxwell's trial). Attorney Mr. Everdell is explaining to the Court why a potential witness was not disclosed earlier, stating they were still verifying the witness's utility. They discuss '26.2 material' (Jencks Act material) and reference a conversation from 'yesterday' (December 16th) regarding the trial schedule, aiming for closing arguments on the following Monday.
DOJ-OGR-00016116.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between the judge and an attorney, Mr. Everdell. The judge outlines concerns and procedures for displaying electronic evidence to a witness who is testifying under a pseudonym, emphasizing the need to prevent accidental identification and ensure the government can see exactly what is being presented. The judge agrees to the electronic method on the condition that paper backups are available and the record is clear, which Mr. Everdell accepts.
DOJ-OGR-00030481.jpg
This is page 6 of a letter dated June 5, 2006, from attorney Gerald B. Lefcourt to Lanna Belohlavek. Lefcourt argues that the State's case against his client has significantly weakened since a meeting on February 16, 2006, by systematically discrediting a key witness. He lists numerous alleged issues with the witness, including a history of theft, prostitution, drug use, and lying, while contrasting this with his client, who has passed a lie detector test and provided favorable psycho-sexual evaluations.
DOJ-OGR-00016908.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between the prosecution (Ms. Comey, Mr. Rohrbach), the defense (Ms. Menninger), and the Court regarding the finalization of stipulations and the withdrawal of a request to issue an arrest warrant for a witness named Kelly Bovino who failed to appear for a subpoena. The parties also discuss resolving issues to avoid calling a witness from London on the following Monday.
DOJ-OGR-00016739.jpg
This court transcript excerpt from August 10, 2022, discusses an upcoming witness from the U.K. and a declaration provided by an unnamed witness. This witness, who owns the Nags Head Pub, has direct knowledge of Ghislaine Maxwell's ownership and residency at a Kinnerton Street property, having observed her presence there daily and noting her occupancy timeline. The document also includes a brief comment from MS. COMEY regarding the defense's preparation time.
DOJ-OGR-00016733.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue involves Defense Attorney Ms. Menninger, The Court, and Government Attorney Ms. Moe discussing the procedure for a witness to invoke their Fifth Amendment rights. The Court and Defense agree that a simple letter or email from the witness's lawyer is insufficient to invoke these rights, and the Defense intends to ask for the subpoena to be enforced, requiring the witness to appear.
DOJ-OGR-00016732.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated August 10, 2022. Attorney Ms. Menninger discusses a third-party witness who has submitted a letter asserting Fifth Amendment privileges to avoid testifying. Menninger argues that the subpoena remains valid and requests the Court enforce it to compel the witness to testify, noting the witness is represented by 'Compton counsel,' a former AUSA.
DOJ-OGR-00016505.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim argues that a witness must testify via WebEx because they have tested positive for COVID and cannot enter the United States. The Court agrees that unavailability is established and anticipates permitting the remote testimony, instructing counsel to work out the logistics.
DOJ-OGR-00016504.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The discussion involves a Prosecutor (Mr. Rohrbach) and the Judge regarding the logistical handling of a witness who has tested positive for COVID-19. The government indicates they will not contest the witness's unavailability under Rule 15 if a positive test exists.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1995-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Unnamed witness | $0.00 | Alleged payment for Interlochen Arts Camp atten... | View |
Witness Statement
She reports seeing a woman with short dark hair at the house.
Unspecified topic that resulted in an article
The witness mentions an article about an interview that was published by The Independent.
Questionnaire and sexual abuse history
The witness states they first learned the questionnaire contained a question about sexual abuse history during an interview with Daily Mail reporter Laura Collins.
An unnamed female's contact with Jeffrey Epstein
A witness answers questions about an unnamed female's interactions with Jeffrey Epstein, stating their contact began around 2003 when she was 15 and continued until 2005. The testimony also references a contact dated March 1, 2003.
Court testimony
A witness who had already testified called Brian, an anticipated witness, to discuss their experience on the witness stand, including a document they were shown. This communication is the basis for a request to bar Brian from testifying.
Offer to sell information
Offered to sell the 'Holy Grail' for $50,000.
Instruction not to discuss testimony
Instruction not to discuss testimony with others.
Testimony
Discussion of testimony which may be a transgression.
Employment and Epstein's residence
Interview regarding when Epstein lived at the property.
Confidential communications
Providing legal services
Cohen, Kushner, Hicks, and Trump's personal life
Questions about Cohen's resentment, Kushner, Hicks, and Trump's affairs/trysts.
testimony regarding Kinnerton Street property
A signed declaration from a witness detailing what his testimony would be, related to the Kinnerton Street property.
testimony regarding Kinnerton Street property
A signed declaration from a witness detailing what his testimony would be, related to the Kinnerton Street property.
Recollection of events
Stated she didn't feel comfortable talking right now or had no specific recollection.
Recollection of events
Stated she didn't feel comfortable talking right now or had no specific recollection.
Financial arrangement between John Connolly and the witne...
An unnamed questioner interviews a witness about their knowledge of a financial arrangement between Vanity Fair reporter John Connolly and the witness's father. The witness claims to have learned of it after the fact and denies knowing any details.
Witness's knowledge of and contact with Steven Lavelle, E...
An unnamed questioner interviews a witness about their relationship with Steven Lavelle, their knowledge of two redacted female names, and their awareness of another girl who allegedly made allegations against Epstein and refused to testify before a Grand Jury. The witness denies current contact with Lavelle and denies knowledge of the other individuals.
Deletion of a MySpace page
An interrogator questions a witness under oath about the timing and motive for deleting their MySpace page, specifically in relation to being under subpoena for the deposition.
Financial arrangement between John Connolly and the witne...
An unnamed questioner interviews a witness about their knowledge of a financial arrangement between Vanity Fair reporter John Connolly and the witness's father. The witness claims to have learned of it after the fact and denies knowing any details.
Arranging a meeting for a statement
Officer Recarey made telephone contact with a witness who agreed to meet at her home.
Police interview arrangement
Officer Recarey made telephone contact with a witness who agreed to meet at her home.
Summer Application
Application stating she did not expect funds from any individual for attendance.
Offer for Annie to visit New York and help with her educa...
Epstein initiated multiple calls with the witness, starting in December 1995. In the first call, he offered to fly Annie to New York to visit Maria for Christmas. In subsequent calls, he discussed helping Annie with her college selection.
Summer Application
Application for summer of '95; no mention of Epstein support.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity