DOJ-OGR-00003108.jpg

763 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

6
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 763 KB
Summary

This legal document is a portion of the prosecution's (the Government's) argument against a defendant's motion to sever perjury counts from other charges. The Government contends that a full re-litigation of a prior defamation action is not necessary and that any potential for 'spillover prejudice' can be managed through stipulations, using a pseudonym for a witness (Giuffre), and providing limiting instructions to the jury. The document cites several legal precedents to support the argument that juries are presumed to follow such instructions.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Giuffre
Mentioned in relation to her allegations in a civil suit, which are central to the perjury counts against the defendant.
Pizarro
Cited in the legal case Pizarro, 2018 WL 1737236.
Zafiro
Cited in the legal case Zafiro, 506 U.S. at 540.
Page
Cited in the legal case Page, 657 F.3d at 130-31.
Rivera
Cited in the legal case Rivera, 546 F.3d at 254.
Pena
Cited as a defendant in the legal case United States v. Pena, 932 F. Supp. 2d 464, 467 (S.D.N.Y. 2013).

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
Government Government agency
Refers to the prosecution, which is arguing against severing perjury counts and is amenable to using stipulations to ...

Timeline (2 events)

A defendant's argument that a trial on perjury counts would require a 'full-blown re-litigation of the defamation action.'
defendant
The Government's argument against severing perjury counts, suggesting measures like stipulations and limiting instructions to the jury to mitigate prejudice.
Government defendant

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned in the citation for United States v. Pena, indicating the case was in the Southern District of New York.

Relationships (1)

The defendant Adversarial (legal) Giuffre
The document discusses Giuffre's allegations and the defendant's denials in a civil suit, which form the basis of perjury counts against the defendant.

Key Quotes (2)

"full-blown re-litigation of the defamation action."
Source
— The defendant (Quoted from the defendant's motion (Def. Mot. 5 at 9) arguing against the trial on perjury counts.)
DOJ-OGR-00003108.jpg
Quote #1
"[J]uries are presumed to follow their instructions."
Source
— Zafiro, 506 U.S. at 540 (A legal principle cited to support the argument that a limiting instruction to the jury would be effective in preventing prejudice.)
DOJ-OGR-00003108.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document