Pena
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-02-12 | Legal decision | Decision in the case United States v. Pena. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
EFTA00034860.pdf
This document is a Daily Activity Report from the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) New York dated July 9, 2019, covering activities from the previous day, July 8, 2019. It notes a significant staff shortage resulting in the vacation of correctional assignment '10-South #2' during both day and evening shifts, and reports that the fire suppression system was inoperative. Crucially, it records that inmate Jeffrey Epstein (#76318-054) was placed on 'Psych Obs' (Psychological Observation) during the Evening Watch shift.
DOJ-OGR-00001627.jpg
This document is page 17 of a court filing (Document 22) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on July 13, 2020. The text argues against granting bail, citing an 'extraordinary risk of flight' and rejecting the defendant's claim that detention at the MDC prevents adequate preparation for defense. The filing cites numerous precedents (Tolentino, Adamu, Brito, etc.) where bail was denied despite access-to-counsel restrictions, distinguishing the current case from *United States v. Stephens*.
DOJ-OGR-00020995.jpg
This legal document, dated February 28, 2023, discusses a 'pyramid scheme of abuse' involving a defendant and Jeffrey Epstein, spanning over a decade. It details how massage was used as a primary method to normalize contact, instigate sexual abuse, and lure young girls, with the defendant also providing cash. The text references trial testimony and legal precedents to argue the continuity and nature of the abuse scheme.
DOJ-OGR-00010378.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that a single, continuous conspiracy of abuse existed for over a decade, involving a defendant and Epstein. It dismisses the distinction between an 'earlier phase' and a later 'pyramid scheme,' asserting that massage was the consistent, primary method used throughout to normalize contact with minor victims and facilitate sexual abuse. The document cites trial testimony to support the claim that the defendant played an essential role in this scheme.
DOJ-OGR-00003108.jpg
This legal document is a portion of the prosecution's (the Government's) argument against a defendant's motion to sever perjury counts from other charges. The Government contends that a full re-litigation of a prior defamation action is not necessary and that any potential for 'spillover prejudice' can be managed through stipulations, using a pseudonym for a witness (Giuffre), and providing limiting instructions to the jury. The document cites several legal precedents to support the argument that juries are presumed to follow such instructions.
DOJ-OGR-00002954.jpg
This document is page 'xix' from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on April 16, 2021. It is a table of authorities listing various United States court cases, from Nitsche to Quinones, along with their legal citations and the page numbers where they are referenced within the larger document. The cases cited span from 1974 to 2018 and originate from several federal courts, including district courts, circuit courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court.
DOJ-OGR-00002892.jpg
This legal document, page 3 of a filing from April 5, 2021, discusses the legal standard for obtaining documents via a subpoena under Rule 17(c). It heavily references the precedent set in 'United States v. Nixon', emphasizing that a request for documents must be made in good faith, be specific, and not constitute a general 'fishing expedition'. The document argues that courts require a stringent showing that the requested materials are relevant, admissible, and specifically identified, rather than just potentially useful to a case.
DOJ-OGR-00002879.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing arguing that a subpoena issued by a defendant should be quashed. The filing contends that the subpoena fails to meet the specificity requirements of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(c), as established in the case United States v. Nixon, because it is an overly broad "fishing expedition" seeking "all communications" with various individuals from the law firm Boies, Schiller, Flexner, LLP.
DOJ-OGR-00002816.jpg
This legal document, dated March 22, 2021, is a filing in a criminal case arguing against the Defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) discovery requests. The filing contends that requests for communications about co-conspirator Jean Luc Brunel, fee agreements with victims Annie and Maria Farmer, Annie Farmer's complete teenage journal, and materials from the Epstein Victim's Compensation Program are irrelevant and improper 'fishing expeditions' for impeachment material. The document cites case law to assert that the Defendant has failed to demonstrate the relevance and admissibility of the requested evidence.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity