DOJ-OGR-00009942.jpg
1020 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
1020 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Conrad, who was a juror in a previous trial. The questioning focuses on a letter Conrad wrote to another individual, Mr. Okula, in which she claimed she held out for two days to convict a defendant, David Parse. This is contrasted with a later statement she made to Judge Pauley, where she stated that Parse should not have been convicted on a particular charge, highlighting a significant contradiction in her accounts of the jury deliberations.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Conrad | Witness |
The person being questioned throughout the transcript, referred to as Ms. Conrad by the court.
|
| Mr. Okula | Recipient of a letter / Attorney |
Person to whom the witness, Conrad, wrote a letter. Also appears to be an attorney making an objection.
|
| David Parse | Defendant |
A person mentioned in a letter written by Conrad, who was a juror in his trial. She wrote that she "solely held out f...
|
| Judge Pauley | Judge |
A judge to whom Conrad made a statement on December 20th, contradicting what she wrote in her letter about David Parse.
|
| Mr. Bharara |
Mentioned in a question to Conrad about whether she told Mr. Okula he was "on track to take Mr. Bharara's job from him."
|
|
| MR. GAIR | Attorney |
An attorney present in the courtroom who asks to respond to an objection and later asks the court to instruct the wit...
|
| Brubaker |
Mentioned in a quote from Conrad where she says she "convicted everybody except the stupid Brubaker."
|
|
| PAUL M. DAUGERDAS | Defendant |
Named in the case title, indicating he is a defendant in the case United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | government agency |
The plaintiff in the case, listed in the document header.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS | company |
The court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings, listed at the bottom of the page.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
An address mentioned in questioning about the letterhead Conrad used.
|
|
|
An address mentioned in questioning about the letterhead Conrad used.
|
Relationships (3)
They likely served on the same jury. Conrad wrote a letter to Mr. Okula after the trial discussing the deliberations. The questioning suggests the tone of the letter may have been overly familiar or 'flirtatious'.
Conrad was a juror in David Parse's trial. She made contradictory statements about her desire to convict him, claiming in a letter she held out to convict him, but telling a judge he shouldn't have been convicted on one charge.
Conrad, a juror, spoke with Judge Pauley on December 20th after the trial to discuss the verdict concerning David Parse.
Key Quotes (3)
"I solely held out for two days on the conspiracy charge for him," referring to David Parse. "I wanted to convict 100 percent not only on that charge."Source
— Conrad
(A quote from a letter Conrad wrote to Mr. Okula, being read to her by the questioner during her testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00009942.jpg
Quote #1
"in my mind Parse should not have been convicted of number 1"Source
— Conrad
(A statement Conrad made to Judge Pauley on December 20th, which contradicts what she wrote in her letter to Mr. Okula.)
DOJ-OGR-00009942.jpg
Quote #2
"For what? For what? I'll retain myself or my husband, the convicted felon. For what? For what, sir? To say that I convicted everybody except the stupid Brubaker? Parse was an idiot but we let him go because I had evidence enough that he really, he didn't really, in my mind he shouldn't have been convicted of number 1."Source
— Conrad
(A quote from Exhibit 3, page 16, which is a transcript of what Conrad said to Judge Pauley on December 20th.)
DOJ-OGR-00009942.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document