DOJ-OGR-00002709.jpg

691 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing (defense motion/brief)
File Size: 691 KB
Summary

This document is page 16 of a legal filing (Document 148) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on February 4, 2021. It contains legal arguments by the defense requesting the immediate disclosure of 'Brady' and 'Giglio' material (exculpatory and impeachment evidence) from the government. The defense argues that Ms. Maxwell needs this information early to prepare an effective defense, citing various legal precedents (United States v. Rodriguez, Bagley, etc.) to support the claim that impeachment evidence falls under the Brady rule.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Referenced as 'Ms. Maxwell'; the defense argues she needs Brady material immediately to prepare her defense.
The Government Prosecution
The opposing party in the legal case; requested to disclose evidence.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
United States District Court
Implied by Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN header.
Department of Justice (DOJ)
referenced in Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002709
Second Circuit Court of Appeals
Cited in case law (2d Cir. 2007, 2d Cir. 2001).
Supreme Court
Cited regarding legal precedent for Brady material.

Relationships (1)

Ghislaine Maxwell Legal Adversaries The Government
Defense motion arguing against the government's timeline for disclosing evidence.

Key Quotes (3)

"Ms. Maxwell must receive this material in sufficient time to investigate and develop it for effective use before and during trial."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002709.jpg
Quote #1
"We therefore request the immediate disclosure of all Brady and Giglio material."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002709.jpg
Quote #2
"The Supreme Court has made clear that impeachment evidence 'falls within the Brady rule.'"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002709.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document