DOJ-OGR-00030451.jpg

696 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

10
People
4
Organizations
6
Locations
11
Events
2
Relationships
0
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Letter
File Size: 696 KB
Summary

This is a letter dated February 22, 2007, from the law firm Atterbury Goldberger Weiss, representing Jeffrey Epstein, to Lanna Belohlavek of the Office of the State Attorney. The letter follows up on a previous meeting and lists eleven specific items of evidence, such as interview transcripts, call logs, and voicemails involving individuals like Haley Robson, Melissa Eaton, and Johanna Sjoberg, that the law firm has determined are missing from the discovery materials provided to them. This document highlights a formal request for missing evidence in the legal proceedings against Jeffrey Epstein.

People (10)

Name Role Context
Joseph R. Atterbury Board Certified Criminal Trial Attorney
Listed as a partner in the law firm ATTERBURY GOLDBERGER WEISS on the letterhead.
Jack A. Goldberger Member of New Jersey & Florida Bars
Listed as a partner in the law firm ATTERBURY GOLDBERGER WEISS on the letterhead.
Jason S. Weiss Attorney
Listed as a partner in the law firm ATTERBURY GOLDBERGER WEISS on the letterhead.
Lanna Belohlavek, Esq. Attorney
Recipient of the letter, works at the Office of the State Attorney.
Jeffrey Epstein Client
The subject of the letter (RE: Jeffrey Epstein), indicating he is the client of the sending law firm.
Haley Robson
Mentioned in a list of missing items, specifically regarding voice mails from 03/31/05 and 04/01/05, and a ride to th...
SK
Mentioned as the sender of a voice mail on 10/04/05 in a list of missing items.
Melissa Eaton
Mentioned in a list of missing items regarding an interview on 01/25/06.
Johanna Sjoberg
Mentioned in a list of missing items regarding an interview on 01/19/06.
Juli Brabon
Mentioned in a list of missing items regarding an interview on 11/15/05.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
ATTERBURY GOLDBERGER WEISS law firm
The sender of the letter, as indicated by the letterhead.
Office of the State Attorney government agency
The employer of the letter's recipient, Lanna Belohlavek.
New Jersey Bar professional association
Jack A. Goldberger is listed as a member.
Florida Bar professional association
Jack A. Goldberger is listed as a member.

Timeline (11 events)

2005-03-16
An interview occurred, for which the transcript is missing page 6.
2005-03-30
A controlled call took place, which is listed as a missing item.
2005-10-03
Haley Robson took a ride to a police station. This event is listed as a missing item.
police station
2005-10-06
An interview occurred, which is listed as a missing item.
2005-10-10
A telephone interview occurred, which is listed as a missing item.
2005-11-09
An interview occurred, which is listed as a missing item.
2005-11-15
An interview occurred, which is listed as a missing item.
2005-11-15
An interview with Juli Brabon occurred, which is listed as a missing item.
2006-01-19
An interview with Johanna Sjoberg occurred, which is listed as a missing item.
2006-01-25
An interview with Melissa Eaton occurred, which is listed as a missing item.
A meeting occurred between the sender and recipient prior to the date of this letter.
Lanna Belohlavek Representative from ATTERBURY GOLDBERGER WEISS

Locations (6)

Location Context
The address of the Office of the State Attorney, where the recipient works.
Location of both the sender's and recipient's offices.
The address of the law firm ATTERBURY GOLDBERGER WEISS.
Jack A. Goldberger is a member of the bar in this state.
Jack A. Goldberger is a member of the bar in this state.
Mentioned as the destination of a ride taken by Haley Robson on 10/03/05.

Relationships (2)

The law firm ATTERBURY GOLDBERGER WEISS sent a letter to the Office of the State Attorney with the subject line 'RE: Jeffrey Epstein', indicating they are representing him in a legal matter.
ATTERBURY GOLDBERGER WEISS professional Lanna Belohlavek
The law firm is corresponding with Lanna Belohlavek of the Office of the State Attorney regarding a legal case, indicating they are opposing counsel or otherwise involved in the same legal proceedings.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document