WEST PALM BEACH, FL
LocationRelationship Network
Jeffrey Epstein Part 02 of 08.pdf
This document collection details the FBI's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein for child prostitution between late 2006 and early 2007. It includes internal FBI communications requesting travel to interview witnesses in New York, New Jersey, New Mexico, and the US Virgin Islands, as well as indications of coordination with the Palm Beach Police Department. The file also contains financial request forms for investigative expenses and notes the creation of link analysis charts (i2 Analyst Notebook) to track the case data.
Epstein_Part_02.pdf
This document contains a collection of FBI internal memos, electronic communications, and administrative forms related to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein under Case ID 31E-MM-108062, covering late 2006 to early 2007. The files detail requests for travel concurrence to interview witnesses in various locations, the assignment of agents, the creation of analyst charts, and financial requests for expenses and search fees. A significant portion of the document consists of Deleted Page Information Sheets listing hundreds of pages withheld under FOIA exemptions.
058.pdf
This document is a legal response filed on behalf of an unnamed Intervener opposing Jeffrey Epstein's motion to stay the release of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The filing argues that the NPA is a public record that was never properly sealed and that Epstein failed to demonstrate the necessary 'irreparable harm' or 'likelihood of success' required to grant a stay. The document was filed in the 15th Judicial Circuit Court of Palm Beach County in July 2009.
053.pdf
This document is a court order from June 26, 2009, issued by Judge Jeffrey J. Colbath in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida. The order denies Jeffrey Epstein's motion to stay the disclosure of his Non-Prosecution Agreement and sets a deadline of July 2, 2009, for the Clerk to release the documents, allowing time for an appeal to the 4th DCA. The document includes a service list of attorneys involved, including U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta and defense attorneys like Jack Goldberger.
049.pdf
A court disposition form from the State of Florida vs. Jeffrey E. Epstein case (No. 502008CF009381AXXXMB) dated June 26, 2009. The hearing addressed a 'Motion to stay' which was denied by Judge Colbath, with a written order to follow. Handwritten notes indicate that documents are delayed until July 2, 2009, and a motion to compel the defendant to post bond was denied; attorney Brad Edwards was present representing a redacted party.
047.pdf
Legal motion filed on June 25, 2009, by Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Critton, Pike, Goldberger) in Palm Beach County Circuit Court. Epstein requests a stay on the disclosure of his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) pending an appellate review, arguing that unsealing the document would cause irreparable harm to privacy rights and innocent third parties. The motion opposes efforts by the Palm Beach Post and a redacted non-party to unseal these court records.
041.pdf
This document is a 'Motion to Make Court Records Confidential' filed by Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys on June 11, 2009, in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County. The defense seeks to maintain the seal on the Non-Prosecution Agreement (filed July 2008) and its Addendum, citing threats to the administration of justice and privacy rights of third parties. The motion references interventions by the Palm Beach Post and a non-party identified as 'EW' (whose name is redacted in one section) seeking access to these records.
035.pdf
This document is a motion filed on June 2, 2009, by The Palm Beach Post seeking to intervene in the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein to unseal a non-prosecution agreement and its addendum. The Post argues that the sealing was improper, lacked necessary legal findings, and that the documents are of significant public interest given the accusations of soliciting minors. The document cites numerous civil lawsuits against Epstein and criticizes the secrecy surrounding his plea deal.
030.pdf
A court minute sheet from the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida, dated May 29, 2009, regarding the case State of Florida vs. Jeffrey E. Epstein (Case No. 502008CF009381AXXXMB). The charge listed is 'Procure Person Under Age of 18 for Prostitution.' A handwritten note across the document indicates 'no action taken' during this specific hearing.
002.pdf
This document is a Civil Cover Sheet (Form JS 44) and an attached list of defendants filed on May 9, 2023, in the Southern District of New York. The filing initiates a derivative lawsuit by 'Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund' against the board and executives of JPMorgan Chase & Co., including Jamie Dimon and Jes Staley. The cover sheet notes the case is related to existing cases 22-10019 (USVI v. JPM) and 22-10904 (Doe v. JPM) presided over by Judge Jed S. Rakoff, which were high-profile lawsuits concerning JPMorgan's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.
017-17.pdf
This document is a Motion for Protective Order filed on June 30, 2010, by Jeffrey Epstein's defense team in the civil case Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein seeks permission to redact specific portions of his tax returns regarding investment vehicles, claiming they contain trade secrets and confidential business information. The motion argues that Plaintiff's counsel, Brad Edwards, has a history of sharing discovery material with media and investigators, specifically citing an instance involving Alfredo Rodriguez's journal.
017-15.pdf
This document is a Motion for Protective Order filed on June 28, 2010, by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in the case of Jane Doe No. 2 vs. Jeffrey Epstein. The motion requests that the court issue an order of confidentiality regarding information Epstein was compelled to produce, specifically his tax returns, passport, and information provided by the federal government during prior criminal proceedings. The defense seeks to prevent this information from being disclosed to third parties or the media and to limit its use strictly to the current litigation.
017-09.pdf
This document contains a Motion for Reconsideration filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in February 2010, arguing against a Magistrate's order compelling him to produce sensitive documents. The motion relies heavily on Fifth Amendment protections against self-incrimination, arguing that despite a Non-Prosecution Agreement, Epstein faces real risks of prosecution in other jurisdictions. Attached exhibits include the Plaintiff's 2009 requests for production of massage logs, photos of Epstein's Palm Beach home, financial records, and medical records from Dr. Stephan Alexander, to which Epstein consistently objected.
016-02.pdf
This document is a Motion for No-Contact Order filed by Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 against Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida on May 22, 2009. The plaintiffs argue that despite a state plea agreement prohibiting contact, Epstein's counsel refused to confirm he would not contact federal victims. The filing includes exhibits of correspondence between attorneys and a transcript of the 2008 plea conference where Judge Pucillo explicitly defined 'indirect contact' to include Facebook and MySpace.
017.pdf
This document is a legal notice filed on June 14, 2010, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, regarding the case of Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. The filing, submitted by attorney Spencer T. Kuvin on behalf of Plaintiff 'C.L.', serves to withdraw a subpoena and cancel the scheduled deposition of Maritza Milagros Vasquez, which was set for the following day, June 15, 2010. The document also includes a certificate of service listing various attorneys representing different parties in related cases against Epstein.
014.pdf
This document is a legal response filed on March 12, 2010, by attorney Tama Beth Kudman on behalf of non-party witness Jean Luc Bruhnel (likely Jean-Luc Brunel) in the civil case Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein. Bruhnel opposes the plaintiff's motion to compel his deposition, arguing that he is a French citizen who has left the United States and cannot be legally compelled to return for testimony. The filing claims the plaintiff's motion is frivolous, notes that previous deposition dates were canceled by agreement, and suggests the plaintiff should use the Hague Convention to secure testimony abroad.
010.pdf
This is a motion filed by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys requesting a court order to allow him to attend mediation, deposition, and trial in the case of Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. The motion notes that a prior no-contact order involving Carolyn Andriano might technically preclude this, but states that Plaintiff's counsel and Ms. Andriano have no objection. The document includes a certificate of service listing numerous attorneys involved in related cases.
009.pdf
Legal filing from November 2009 in the case of Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein's attorneys argue for the preservation of evidence held by the law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler (RRA), noting that the DOJ has seized boxes of documents from RRA, including 13 boxes related to Epstein. The document also disputes delays in the deposition of RRA's Chief Restructuring Officer, Herbert Stettin, citing upcoming trial deadlines.
008.pdf
This document contains a Motion for Protective Order filed by Igor Zinoview and Jeffrey Epstein to limit the scope of depositions in a civil case. Zinoview asserts via affidavit that he only began working for Epstein in November 2005, after the alleged events, and thus has no relevant knowledge. The filing also includes excerpts from the depositions of Epstein's pilots, Larry Visoski and Larry Eugene Morrison, where they are questioned about their personal beliefs regarding the sexual abuse allegations and whether they would trust Epstein with their own daughters. Flight logs and passenger manifests are referenced in the deposition indexes ('PLAINTIFF'S EX. 1 FLIGHT LOG BOOK' and 'JEGE, Inc., Passenger Manifest') but the actual log content is not present in these specific pages.
MOTION-EXT%20OF%20TIME%20(JURIS%20BRIEF).pdf
This is a legal motion filed on December 14, 2015, in the Supreme Court of Florida (Case No. SC15-2286) by Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Paul Morris. Epstein requests an extension of time until January 19, 2016, to file his initial brief on jurisdiction. The document notes that the Respondent's counsel, Philip M. Burlington, has no objection to the request, and includes a service list of attorneys involved in the related proceedings.
LETTER.pdf
This document is a legal filing dated December 10, 2015, in which Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Paul Morris, files a 'Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction' with the Supreme Court of Florida. Epstein is appealing a decision made on November 12, 2015, by the District Court of Appeal (Fourth District) in the case of 'Bradley J. Edwards v. Jeffrey Epstein'. The attached opinion reveals that the lower court reversed a summary judgment that had favored Epstein, ruling that 'litigation privilege' does not bar Edwards' claim of malicious prosecution against Epstein.
036.pdf
A legal filing (Sur-Reply) by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys arguing that Plaintiff Bradley Edwards must produce solicitation letters sent to former Epstein employees and their responses. The defense argues Edwards waived work-product privilege by failing to produce a privilege log and that the letters sent to third parties do not constitute work product.
030.pdf
This document is a Civil Docket Report for Case No. 0:16-mc-61262-JG, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on June 13, 2016. The case involves Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards filing a motion to quash a subpoena against Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The docket records various motions, including requests to seal exhibits and appear Pro Hac Vice, culminating in an order on December 22, 2016, to transfer the motion to the Southern District of New York to be handled as part of the case Giuffre v. Maxwell (1:15-cv-07433-RWS). The case was terminated in the Florida court on December 23, 2016.
010.pdf
Declaration by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on June 30, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida. The document lists 18 exhibits (A-R) supporting Maxwell's opposition to Bradley J. Edwards' motion to quash a subpoena. Several exhibits are filed under seal, while others include procedural documents from related cases (Cassell v. Dershowitz, Epstein v. Rothstein, Jane Doe v. US) and communications regarding discovery and subpoenas.
081.pdf
Legal filing from July 2, 2010, in the case of Jane Doe II vs. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. Plaintiff's counsel Isidro Garcia responds to a court order, apologizing for delays in filing a scheduling report, partly attributing the delay to difficulty serving Sarah Kellen who was 'believed to have been avoiding service.' The document announces that a settlement has been reached resolving all claims in this federal case and a companion state court case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity