DOJ-OGR-00000934.jpg

616 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
4
Relationships
0
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 616 KB
Summary

This legal document, part of case 21-770, argues for granting bond by citing four precedent cases from the Southern District of New York (Hussain, Buser, Acosta, and McFadden). In each cited case, defendants charged under similar statutes (18 U.S.C. 2422 and 2423) were granted personal recognizance bonds ranging from $100,000 to $250,000 with various conditions like home detention and electronic monitoring. The document uses these examples to demonstrate a pattern of granting bond in similar circumstances within the same jurisdiction.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Hussain defendant
Defendant in the case United States v. Hussain, charged with 18 U.S.C. 2422 violations and granted a $100,000 bond.
Buser defendant
Defendant in the case United States v. Buser, charged with 18 U.S.C. 2422 and 2423 violations and granted a $100,000 ...
Acosta defendant
Defendant in the case United States v. Acosta, charged with 18 U.S.C. 2422 violations and granted a $100,000 bond.
McFadden defendant
Defendant in the case United States v. McFadden, charged with 18 U.S.C. 2422 and 2423 violations and granted a $250,0...

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
United States government agency
Plaintiff in four cited court cases: United States v. Hussain, United States v. Buser, United States v. Acosta, and U...
Southern District of New York government agency
The court district where the cited cases (Hussain, Buser, Acosta, McFadden) were adjudicated.
Government government agency
Mentioned in the context of its detention application being denied in the Acosta case.

Timeline (4 events)

2016-03-29
In United States v. Acosta, the court denied the Government's detention application and granted the defendant a $100,000 personal recognizance bond with conditions including home detention and electronic monitoring.
Southern District of New York
2017-06-22
In United States v. McFadden, the defendant was granted a $250,000 personal recognizance bond secured by property, with conditions including home detention and electronic monitoring.
Southern District of New York
2017-10-19
In United States v. Buser, the defendant was granted a $100,000 personal recognizance bond secured by $10,000 cash, with conditions including electronic monitoring.
Southern District of New York
2018-10-02
In United States v. Hussain, the defendant was granted a $100,000 personal recognizance bond with conditions including home detention and electronic monitoring.
Southern District of New York

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location where defendants charged under a specific statute are regularly granted bond, as per the document's argument.

Relationships (4)

United States legal Hussain
The document cites the court case 'United States v. Hussain', indicating an adversarial legal relationship where the United States is the plaintiff and Hussain is the defendant.
United States legal Buser
The document cites the court case 'United States v. Buser', indicating an adversarial legal relationship where the United States is the plaintiff and Buser is the defendant.
United States legal Acosta
The document cites the court case 'United States v. Acosta', indicating an adversarial legal relationship where the United States is the plaintiff and Acosta is the defendant.
United States legal McFadden
The document cites the court case 'United States v. McFadden', indicating an adversarial legal relationship where the United States is the plaintiff and McFadden is the defendant.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document