| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-23 | N/A | McFadden interview discussion | Unknown | View |
| 2017-06-22 | Court ruling | In United States v. McFadden, the defendant was granted a $250,000 personal recognizance bond sec... | Southern District of New York | View |
An email exchange dated July 23, 2019, discussing a New York Times article about Jeffrey Epstein moving money overseas via Deutsche Bank transactions flagged to the U.S. authorities. The sender confirms that their 'Team was already on it' and notes that 'McFadden' (likely a journalist) has discussed the matter in an interview.
This legal document, part of case 21-770, argues for granting bond by citing four precedent cases from the Southern District of New York (Hussain, Buser, Acosta, and McFadden). In each cited case, defendants charged under similar statutes (18 U.S.C. 2422 and 2423) were granted personal recognizance bonds ranging from $100,000 to $250,000 with various conditions like home detention and electronic monitoring. The document uses these examples to demonstrate a pattern of granting bond in similar circumstances within the same jurisdiction.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity