DOJ-OGR-00021750.jpg
676 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
676 KB
Summary
This document is a legal brief from a court case, dated July 27, 2023, filed on behalf of Ms. Maxwell. It argues that her sentence was erroneous due to a miscalculation and an unsupported four-point enhancement. The brief also contends that Ms. Maxwell is a third-party beneficiary of a non-prosecution agreement that should have barred the USAO-SDNY from prosecuting her, and requests that her conviction be reversed or the case be remanded.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Appellant |
The central figure in the document, arguing against her sentence and conviction.
|
| Annabi | Party in a cited legal case |
Mentioned in the legal citation 'U.S. v. Annabi' to support an argument about non-prosecution agreements.
|
| Cambindo-Valencia | Party in a cited legal case |
Mentioned in the legal citation 'U.S. v. Cambindo-Valencia' to support a legal argument.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| District Court | government agency |
The court that issued the sentence Ms. Maxwell is appealing.
|
| USAO-SDNY | government agency |
The United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, which was allegedly barred from prosecutin...
|
| DOJ-OGR | government agency |
Appears as part of a document control number (DOJ-OGR-00021750) at the bottom of the page, likely referring to the De...
|
Timeline (2 events)
2023-07-27
Filing of Document 87 in Case 22-1426, which is an Appellant's Principal Brief.
The District Court issued a sentence to Ms. Maxwell which included a four-point enhancement.
District Court
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Referenced by the acronym SDNY in USAO-SDNY, indicating the jurisdiction of the prosecutor's office.
|
Relationships (2)
Ms. Maxwell is appealing a sentence issued by the District Court.
The document argues that the USAO-SDNY was barred from prosecuting Ms. Maxwell due to a non-prosecution agreement.
Key Quotes (1)
"it affirmatively appears that the agreement contemplates a broader restriction,"Source
— U.S. v. Annabi
(Cited as a legal precedent for an exception allowing a non-prosecution agreement to be enforced outside its original district.)
DOJ-OGR-00021750.jpg
Quote #1
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document