| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
USAO-SDFL
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Appellant
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Subject of the agreement
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
EDNY
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
USAO-SDFL
|
Jurisdictional separation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Prosecutor defendant |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Boies Schiller
|
Informant witness to prosecutor |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Nathaniel Gamble II
|
Professional advisory |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
OPR
|
Investigative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Interview | The subject must agree to meet with and be interviewed by the USAO-SDNY, the Federal Bureau of In... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The court holds that the NPA between Epstein and USAO-SDFL does not bind USAO-SDNY. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Case 22-1426, Document 87, filed on 07/27/2023. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Discussion of the potential prosecution of Maxwell by the USAO-SDNY and whether a Non-Prosecution... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Prosecution of Maxwell by the USAO-SDNY. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's appeal/contention regarding the application of the NPA to her prosecution in SDNY. | Second Circuit Court of App... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Appeal regarding the NPA bar on prosecution | Appellate Court | View |
| 2021-05-21 | N/A | Planned filing of public letter notifying Court of deferred prosecution acceptance. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-03-29 | Indictment | Maxwell's second superseding indictment | N/A | View |
| 2019-11-14 | N/A | USAO-SDNY obtained indictment against Tova Noel and Michael Thomas. | SDNY | View |
| 2019-08-09 | N/A | Planned submission of application for a search warrant for Little Saint James. | U.S. Virgin Islands | View |
| 2018-11-29 | N/A | USAO-SDNY initiated investigation into Epstein and co-conspirators | New York | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Investigation | The USAO-SDNY opened its investigation into Epstein and his co-conspirators. | N/A | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Investigation | The USAO-SDNY commences the instant investigation. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Investigation | The USAO-SDNY did not open an investigation into Epstein or Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| 2001-01-01 | N/A | Period of conduct charged under Count Six | Not specified | View |
This document is a formal legal opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirming the conviction and 240-month prison sentence of Ghislaine Maxwell for sex trafficking and related offenses. The court rejected Maxwell's appeal on five grounds, including arguments regarding a non-prosecution agreement, statute of limitations, juror misconduct, jury instructions, and sentencing reasonableness. The document also includes a subsequent order from November 2024 denying Maxwell's petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc.
This document is an internal Department of Justice email chain from October 9, 2019. It discusses an unsolicited offer from Arlan Ettinger, President of Guernsey's Auctioneers & Brokers, to be retained to handle the auction/disposition of the late Jeffrey Epstein's property. The DOJ officials decide to send a standard polite rejection, noting internally that they do not yet have possession of any properties.
This document contains the Declaration of Russell Capone, Counsel to the Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, in support of the Federal Bureau of Prisons' motion for summary judgment regarding FOIA requests filed by The New York Times Company concerning Jeffrey Epstein's incarceration and death. The declaration details the prosecutions of correctional officers Tova Noel and Michael Thomas for falsifying records related to Epstein's suicide, and Nicholas Tartaglione for a quadruple homicide, arguing that releasing certain records would interfere with these pending cases. Attached as Exhibit A is the Indictment of Tova Noel and Michael Thomas, and as Exhibit B is the Superseding Indictment of Nicholas Tartaglione.
This document is an internal email chain discussing a Uniform Message Report (UMR) regarding deferred prosecution agreements for two correctional officers, Tova Noel and Michael Thomas. These officers were charged with making false statements and obstructing the lawful function of the MCC in connection with Jeffrey Epstein's suicide on August 10, 2019. The agreements require their cooperation with an OIG investigation, admission of guilt, and community service.
This document contains an internal Department of Justice email chain from October 2019 regarding the disposition of the late Jeffrey Epstein's property. Arlan Ettinger, President of Guernsey’s Auctioneers & Brokers, had reached out offering to handle the property sale. The matter was assigned to the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY) per instructions from Nathaniel Gamble II at the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG), and a response letter was drafted on October 15, 2019.
A 2020 travel questionnaire for an AUSA from the Southern District of New York requesting travel to Stockholm, Sweden. The purpose was to interview a Swedish witness ('Jane Doe') regarding the ongoing and sensitive investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The traveler was accompanied by three other AUSAs and one FBI Special Agent.
This document is an email chain from April 2020 between the DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). OPR is seeking to interview 32 individuals regarding their historical contacts (2005-2008) with the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL) and FBI Miami concerning the Epstein case. SDNY agrees to the interviews but requests that OPR avoid discussing the substance of the underlying criminal scheme or interactions with Epstein to avoid interfering with SDNY's active investigation, noting that any relevant statements must be handled as '3500 material' (Jencks Act). The correspondence lists the legal representation for the 32 individuals, noting the majority are represented by Brad Edwards.
An internal email dated November 5, 2019, discussing a draft 'Priorities webpage' for the USAO-SDNY. The sender outlines necessary edits regarding formatting and content (specifically 'Combatting Corruption' and 'Acts of Terror') and notes that a colleague named Nick is working on the visuals. The document includes a link to an SDNY webpage.
This document is an email dated August 8, 2019, forwarding an Urgent Matter Report (UMR) from U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman (SDNY) to the Attorney General's office. The report details a plan by the USAO-SDNY and FBI-NY to obtain a search warrant for Jeffrey Epstein's private island, Little Saint James, on August 9, 2019, and execute it on August 12, 2019. The justification cites information suggesting additional crimes were committed on the island and the potential presence of evidence, such as sexual photographs, based on findings from a prior search of his New York residence.
This document is an internal Department of Justice email chain from October 9, 2019, discussing an offer from Arlan Ettinger, President of Guernsey’s Auctioneers & Brokers, to handle the disposition of the late Jeffrey Epstein's property. The emails indicate that Nathaniel Gamble II from the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG) advised assigning this matter to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY).
This document is an email dated July 27, 2020, from the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) to the Chief of Public Corruption at USAO-SDNY. It provides statistical data regarding an OPR investigation into the handling of the Epstein case, noting that approximately 516,000 email files were obtained from 5 subjects, with about 3,000 deemed directly relevant. The email also details document counts related to the CVRA litigation, distinguishing between pages produced to petitioners and privileged documents submitted to the court.
Supplemental declaration by Russell Capone filed on January 15, 2021, in the FOIA case between The New York Times and the Bureau of Prisons. Capone justifies the withholding of specific BOP records—including staffing rosters, psychology records, and logs from July and August 2019—under Exemption 7(A) to prevent interference with the ongoing criminal prosecutions of Noel and Tartaglione related to Jeffrey Epstein's incarceration and death.
This document is an internal Department of Justice email chain from October 9, 2019, discussing an unsolicited offer from Arlan Ettinger, President of Guernsey’s Auctioneers & Brokers. Ettinger wrote to offer his firm's services to handle the disposition of the late Jeffrey Epstein's property. DOJ officials characterized the offer as 'cheeky' and discussed drafting a standard polite refusal.
This document is an Urgent Matter Report (UMR) from the USAO-SDNY dated June 29, 2021, detailing the imminent release of approximately 2,700 pages of Bureau of Prisons records to The New York Times following FOIA litigation. The release includes internal memos, psychological records showing Epstein received special treatment and manipulated staff, an autopsy report, and details regarding institutional failures at MCC. The documents were previously withheld due to the criminal prosecution of guards Tova Noel and Michael Thomas, which concluded with deferred prosecution agreements.
This document is a Deferred Prosecution Agreement for Michael Thomas, a Bureau of Prisons guard charged in connection with the events surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. Thomas admits to willfully falsifying 'count and round slips' at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) on August 9 and 10, 2019. In exchange for deferring prosecution for six months, Thomas agrees to 100 hours of community service, cooperation with federal investigators (FBI, DOJ-OIG), and good behavior.
This document details a legal case where a 'Petitioner' attempted to dismiss an indictment, arguing that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) barred her prosecution as a coconspirator. Both the district court and the court of appeals rejected this argument, finding that the NPA only bound the Florida USAO and did not preclude the USAO-SDNY from prosecuting Maxwell for related offenses. The Petitioner was found guilty on multiple counts and sentenced to 240 months imprisonment.
This document discusses legal arguments concerning the timeliness of an indictment against Maxwell and the scope of U.S. Attorney's powers. It states that the District Court denied Maxwell's motion, finding that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) did not prevent the USAO-SDNY from prosecuting her. Maxwell also argues that certain counts are untimely and that a 2003 amendment to the statute of limitations (§ 3283) should not apply to her case.
This document discusses the scope and negotiation history of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) involving Epstein and the USAO-SDFL, examining whether it was intended to bind other districts like USAO-SDNY. It cites the United States Attorney's Manual regarding the approval process for agreements and notes that the Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division denied having a role in Epstein's NPA. The document also mentions that prosecution in Florida was deferred in favor of state prosecution, provided Epstein adhered to the agreement's conditions.
This document is a legal ruling affirming the District Court's June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction against Ghislaine Maxwell. It states that Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement did not bar Maxwell's prosecution, her indictment complied with the statute of limitations, and her sentence was procedurally reasonable. The background details Maxwell's role in coordinating and facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of women and underage girls from 1994 until approximately 2004 across various U.S. locations.
This document is the final page (26) of a United States Court of Appeals ruling filed on January 23, 2024. The court affirms the June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction against Ghislaine Maxwell, rejecting five specific arguments on appeal, including the claim that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) in Florida prevented her prosecution in New York.
This legal document argues that the duties of U.S. Attorneys are statutorily confined to their specific districts, a principle established since 1789. It contends that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) did not prevent the USAO-SDNY from prosecuting Maxwell, citing legal precedent (Annabi) and statutes (28 U.S.C. § 547 and § 515) to support its position on prosecutorial jurisdiction.
This document is page 10 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on December 2, 2024. It argues that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was limited solely to the Southern District of Florida and does not prevent the USAO-SDNY from prosecuting Ghislaine Maxwell. The text cites the 'Annabi' precedent to support the conclusion that the agreement does not bind other districts.
This legal document is a court opinion regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal. Maxwell argued that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL) immunized her from prosecution. The court rejected her argument, holding that the NPA made with the USAO-SDFL does not legally bind the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY) from prosecuting her.
This document is the final page (page 26) of an appellate court decision dated September 17, 2024, affirming the conviction of Ghislaine Maxwell. The court lists five key holdings, rejecting Maxwell's arguments regarding Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement, the statute of limitations, a motion for a new trial, jury instructions, and sentencing reasonableness. The document concludes by explicitly affirming the District Court's June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction.
This legal document, part of Case 22-1426, argues that the duties of U.S. Attorneys are statutorily confined to their specific districts. It cites the case of Annabi to support the claim that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) did not prevent the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY) from prosecuting an individual named Maxwell. The document includes footnotes referencing U.S. Code to detail the powers and limitations of U.S. Attorneys, including the exception that the Attorney General can authorize them to act outside their districts.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity