DOJ-OGR-00009944.jpg
1010 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
1010 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Conrad. The questioning focuses on her credibility, exploring her past actions as a juror for a Mr. Okula, her understanding of financial matters from an expert named Dr. DeRosa, and her failure to disclose a prior disciplinary suspension from the Bar Association during jury selection. The transcript also reveals personal details, such as her husband being a convicted felon, which are used to challenge her character and motivations.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Conrad | Witness / Juror |
The individual being questioned during a direct examination. Referred to as "Ms. Conrad" on page 208.
|
| Mr. Okula | Party in a previous case |
Mentioned on page 205 as someone for whom the witness, Conrad, was "fighting for his side" as a juror.
|
| MR. GAIR | Attorney |
Makes an objection ("Incorrect.") on page 205 and is mentioned on page 206 as having asked the witness about her husb...
|
| Dr. DeRosa | Expert |
Mentioned on page 206 as an expert whose "numbers" the witness was referring to.
|
| Mr. Parse |
Mentioned on page 206 in a question about his knowledge of the lack of economic substance in transactions.
|
|
| PAUL M. DAUGERDAS | Defendant |
Named in the case title "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.," at the top of page 207.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | government agency |
The plaintiff in the case, as seen in the case title at the top of page 207.
|
| Bar Association | professional association |
Mentioned on page 207 as having taken disciplinary action against the witness, Conrad.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS | company |
Identified as the court reporting service at the bottom of the document.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2012-02-15
Direct examination of witness Conrad in the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Named as the plaintiff in the legal case.
|
Relationships (2)
The transcript reveals Conrad's husband is a convicted felon who served a seven and a half year sentence. She married him three years after he finished his sentence. (Page 206-207)
Key Quotes (3)
"I fought the good fight."Source
— Conrad
(A statement Conrad wrote, which the questioning attorney suggests was her way of telling Mr. Okula she was fighting for his side during a trial (Page 205).)
DOJ-OGR-00009944.jpg
Quote #1
"A job's a job, sir. That's how I see it."Source
— Conrad
(Her explanation on page 208 for why she did not feel an obligation to tell the Court about her past disciplinary action and suspension by the Bar Association.)
DOJ-OGR-00009944.jpg
Quote #2
"Those were my words."Source
— Conrad
(Her confirmation on page 208 that she previously stated her omissions and lies were done to make her more marketable as a juror.)
DOJ-OGR-00009944.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document