DOJ-OGR-00003113.jpg
743 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
743 KB
Summary
This document is a legal filing from April 16, 2021, arguing that an indictment against a defendant is legally sufficient. It cites several legal precedents, including Russell v. United States and United States v. Pirro, to establish the standards for specificity in indictments. The author contends that the indictment in question meets these standards by laying out all essential elements of the crimes charged and that the defendant has provided no legal authority to suggest otherwise.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Russell | Party in a legal case |
Mentioned in the legal citation 'Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749 (1962)'.
|
| Pirro | Party in a legal case |
Mentioned in the legal citation 'United States v. Pirro, 212 F.3d 86, 93 (2d Cir. 2000)'.
|
| Stringer | Party in a legal case |
Mentioned in the legal citation 'See Stringer, 730 F.3d at 127'.
|
| Wey | Party in a legal case |
Mentioned in the legal citation 'See Wey, 2017 WL 237651 at *5'.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States | government agency |
Party in the legal cases 'Russell v. United States' and 'United States v. Pirro'.
|
| Second Circuit | court |
Cited as the court that 'has previously found that the failure to name a specific victim of fraud does not render an ...
|
| DOJ | government agency |
Appears in the footer as part of the document identifier 'DOJ-OGR-00003113'.
|
Timeline (3 events)
The document presents an argument that an indictment against a defendant is legally sufficient and satisfies the standard for sufficiency.
defendant
The document references a defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of specificity.
defendant
Relationships (2)
Parties in the court case 'Russell v. United States'.
Parties in the court case 'United States v. Pirro'.
Key Quotes (5)
"specification of what statements are alleged to be false, and in what respect they are false, in charges of criminal falsity,"Source
— Legal precedent
(Quoted as a standard for indictment specificity.)
DOJ-OGR-00003113.jpg
Quote #1
"the subject matter of the congressional inquiry"Source
— Legal precedent
(Quoted as a standard for indictment specificity regarding charges of refusal to answer questions in a congressional inquiry.)
DOJ-OGR-00003113.jpg
Quote #2
"where an indictment charges a crime that depends in turn on violation of another statute, the indictment must identify the underlying offense."Source
— United States v. Pirro
(Quoted as a legal standard for indictments involving multiple statutes.)
DOJ-OGR-00003113.jpg
Quote #3
"depart from the usual sufficiency framework"Source
— Wey
(Quoted from a case where a defendant declined to depart from the standard framework for indictment sufficiency.)
DOJ-OGR-00003113.jpg
Quote #4
"cites no authority"Source
— Wey
(Quoted from a case describing a defendant who failed to provide legal authority for their argument.)
DOJ-OGR-00003113.jpg
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document