Russell
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Sender (Redacted)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Laura Knoblach
|
Supervisor subordinate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Wexner
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
USANYS Staff
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-13 | N/A | Meeting regarding Epstein FOIA Next Steps - Noel Team (Proposed times discussed) | Teleconference (Dial-in) | View |
| 2021-01-01 | Legal case | Russell v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 2601 (2021) | N/A | View |
| 2020-05-11 | N/A | Call with new ASAC regarding data extraction issues. | Unknown (likely phone) | View |
| 2019-03-11 | N/A | Internal discussion regarding presentation on campaign finance cases (NRA, PIC, GEP) and potentia... | USANYS (Implied) | View |
| 1962-12-31 | Legal case | Citation for the case Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749 (1962). | N/A | View |
EFTA00034902.pdf
This document is a Daily Lieutenant's Log from the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York, dated July 18, 2019. It details operational counts, inmate movements (court, hospital, new commits), and facility issues, specifically noting malfunctions with the Sallyport door and the Public Address system. Several inmates are listed by name and number, while specific inmates on suicide watch and psychiatric observation have their names redacted.
EFTA00027444.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the FBI regarding the digital forensics processing of evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the Virgin Islands. The correspondence highlights significant technical and logistical friction; the USANYS required data in a processed format compatible with the 'Relativity' review platform for legal discovery, while the FBI provided raw forensic dumps (phone extractions, hard drive clones) which were difficult to review. The text mentions terabytes of data, including 50+ devices, servers, and older evidence from a 2007 search, but contains no actual flight logs or passenger manifests (flight records are only mentioned hypothetically as an example of file-linking errors).
EFTA00026920.pdf
An email thread from April 13, 2021, among staff at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) attempting to schedule a meeting regarding 'Epstein FOIA Next Steps'. The participants discuss availability for that evening versus the following morning, mentioning a colleague named Russell. The initial appointment was proposed for 4:00 PM - 4:30 PM.
EFTA00025533.pdf
A confidential document from the law firm Debevoise & Plimpton listing matters in which the firm appeared before the USAO-SDNY. The document is heavily redacted, with nearly all case captions blacked out. The only visible entry is 'Wexner: Epstein investigation' on page 3, accompanied by a note stating 'Russell cleared to participate'.
EFTA00025091.pdf
This document is a response to follow-up questions from an attorney proffer regarding an executive assistant (identified by context as 'LG' or Lesley Groff) who worked for Jeffrey Epstein from approximately 2002 to 2019. The text details her hiring process, the logistics of scheduling massages (which she claims stopped after the Florida plea), office locations, document shredding by an office helper in 2009, and her lack of knowledge regarding illegal activities or abuse. It also covers her travel to Epstein's properties, including visits to Little St. James and Paris, and her final resignation in July 2019 after feeling 'betrayed' by the indictment.
EFTA00017888.pdf
An internal email exchange within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated March 11, 2019. Staff members discuss a presentation requested by 'Laura' regarding campaign finance cases involving the NRA, PIC (Presidential Inaugural Committee), and GEP (Global Energy Producers), noting ties to the President (POTUS). When asked if a redacted individual needs to recuse themselves ('step out'), the response provided is 'Epstein OK'.
DOJ-OGR-00015585.jpg
This document is a photograph labeled 'GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT 246-R' from a legal case, showing a bookshelf with a collection of books. The book titles suggest an interest in science, technology, philosophy, and the human mind, with authors including Marvin Minsky, Stephen Jay Gould, and Esther Dyson. The image is marked with a Department of Justice control number, indicating its use in an official investigation or proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00002314.jpg
This legal document, filed on January 25, 2021, is an argument on behalf of Ms. Maxwell to dismiss the Superseding Indictment against her. The defense claims the indictment is unconstitutionally vague because it fails to specify dates for the alleged crimes beyond a broad '1994-1997' range and lacks specific details, thereby preventing Ms. Maxwell from preparing an adequate defense. The filing requests the Court to either dismiss counts one through four of the indictment or compel the Government to provide a Bill of Particulars with more specific information.
DOJ-OGR-00002313.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' from a legal filing (Document 124) in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It lists four legal cases and one federal rule of criminal procedure as legal precedent for arguments made within the larger document. The cases cited span from 1962 to 2019 and involve various individuals in legal proceedings against the United States.
DOJ-OGR-00009056.jpg
This is a page from a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated February 24, 2022. The document argues that Juror No. 50 falsely answered questions during jury selection (voir dire) and requests subpoenas for the juror's emails with alleged victims, witnesses, or other jurors.
DOJ-OGR-00009747.jpg
This legal document, filed on March 11, 2022, is a request by Ms. Maxwell to the Court for pre-hearing discovery. She asks the court to authorize subpoenas for the communications of Juror No. 50, who is alleged to have answered a question falsely during voir dire. The request seeks emails and other written communications between Juror No. 50 and any alleged victims, witnesses, or other jurors in the case to investigate potential juror misconduct.
DOJ-OGR-00009697.jpg
This document is page 5 of a Table of Authorities from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 11, 2022. It lists numerous legal cases, from 1976 to 2021, that are cited as precedent within the main document. Each entry includes the case name, its legal citation, and the page numbers where it is referenced.
DOJ-OGR-00003113.jpg
This document is a legal filing from April 16, 2021, arguing that an indictment against a defendant is legally sufficient. It cites several legal precedents, including Russell v. United States and United States v. Pirro, to establish the standards for specificity in indictments. The author contends that the indictment in question meets these standards by laying out all essential elements of the crimes charged and that the defendant has provided no legal authority to suggest otherwise.
DOJ-OGR-00002943.jpg
This document is page 9 of 239 from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on April 16, 2021. It is a table of authorities, listing numerous legal case citations alphabetically from 'Miller v. Pate' to 'SEC v. TheStreet.com'. Each entry includes the case name, its legal reporter citation, and the page numbers where it is referenced within the main document.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016990.jpg
The text discusses the evolution of the Turing Test and AI communication, contrasting historical text-based interfaces with modern visual displays like Wolfram|Alpha. The speaker questions the utility of a conventional Turing Test, suggesting that a more practical application involves automating tasks like email responses using deep learning and personal data archives.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016938.jpg
This document is an essay or book chapter titled 'The Human Strategy' by MIT Professor Alex 'Sandy' Pentland (page 135). It discusses the evolution of AI and cybernetics, arguing that we are moving toward 'human-AI ecologies' where machine learning is used to guide complex networks of people and systems, similar to managing ecosystems. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating its inclusion in a government investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's connections to academia and the MIT Media Lab.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity