DOJ-OGR-00004738.jpg
720 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order / legal filing (page 2 of 6)
File Size:
720 KB
Summary
This is page 2 of a court order filed on June 4, 2021, in the case United States v. Maxwell. The court is addressing Ghislaine Maxwell's request to subpoena the entire journal of 'Minor Victim-2.' The court rejects Maxwell's arguments, characterizing the request as a 'fishing expedition' and noting that impeachment material is generally not obtainable via Rule 17(c) subpoena prior to trial. The document also notes that 'BSF' (likely legal counsel for the victim) has stated the unproduced portions of the journal do not mention Maxwell or Jeffrey Epstein.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Moving party seeking access to a journal/diary via Rule 17(c) subpoena.
|
| Minor Victim-2 | Witness/Victim |
Author of the journal/diary being sought by the defense.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Associate |
Mentioned in relation to when Minor Victim-2 first met him; BSF claims the journal does not discuss him.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court (S.D.N.Y.) |
The court issuing the order/opinion.
|
|
| BSF |
Likely Boies Schiller Flexner (representing victims); represented that the journal does not discuss Maxwell or Epstein.
|
|
| The Government |
Mentioned as having a similar position to BSF regarding the journal.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Unknown
First meeting between Minor Victim-2, Epstein, and Maxwell
Unknown
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Southern District of New York, cited in case law.
|
Relationships (2)
Document discusses the timeline of the victim meeting 'Epstein or Maxwell' and notes the journal allegedly discusses neither.
Maxwell is seeking Minor Victim-2's journal for impeachment purposes.
Key Quotes (4)
"Maxwell appears to proffer two theories of relevance as to the entire journal."Source
DOJ-OGR-00004738.jpg
Quote #1
"At best, the theory amounts to little more than a “fishing expedition,” which is not the proper use of Rule 17(c)."Source
DOJ-OGR-00004738.jpg
Quote #2
"Maxwell does not explain why the absence of references to her in those entries would be relevant"Source
DOJ-OGR-00004738.jpg
Quote #3
"BSF has represented that the rest of the journal does not discuss Maxwell or Jeffrey Epstein."Source
DOJ-OGR-00004738.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document