BSF
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Maria Farmer
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Accuser-2
|
Client |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-05 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 72 in Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, arguing for the unsealing of grand jury transcri... | N/A | View |
| 2019-04-09 | Transfer of records | Following Judge McMahon's order, BSF turned over its records from the civil litigation to the Gov... | N/A | View |
| 2005-04-01 | Investigation | An unspecified activity was conducted with the assistance of BSF. | N/A | View |
EFTA00029535.pdf
This document contains an email thread between the US Attorney's Office and defense counsel regarding the case USA v. Maxwell on June 30, 2021. The correspondence follows a court order (Docket 305) requiring the parties to submit proposed redactions to the court's opinion on suppression motions. Defense attorney Christian Everdell confirms they have no redactions, and prosecutor Lara Pomerantz agrees to file a joint letter conveying this to the court.
EFTA00020769.pdf
This document is an email chain from March and April 2019 between the Southern District of New York (SDNY) Assistant U.S. Attorney's office and technical support staff regarding the 'US v. Epstein' case (USAO # 2018R01618). The correspondence details the process of loading subpoena returns from the law firm Boies Schiller (referred to as BSF) into the Relativity e-discovery database. The emails specifically reference file paths containing video interviews with individuals identified only by initials (H.R., J.H., S.V., A.D., A.T.) and discuss the technical handling of DVD file structures.
EFTA00020692.pdf
This document is an email chain from March and April 2019 between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and IT/litigation support staff regarding the 'US v. Epstein' case (2018R01618). The correspondence details the technical process of uploading subpoena returns from the law firm Boies Schiller (referred to as BSF) into the Relativity review platform. The text reveals specific file paths indicating the government was in possession of video interviews with individuals identified by initials (H.R., J.H., S.V., A.D., A.T.).
EFTA00020246.pdf
This document is an internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated between April 30 and May 3, 2021. The discussion concerns drafting a response to Judge Nathan's order regarding Rule 17 subpoenas related to specific evidence items: 'Diary, boots, photos'. The emails mention reviewing briefs filed by 'BSF/GM' (likely Boies Schiller Flexner and Ghislaine Maxwell) and preparing the response for review by 'the chiefs' before a Tuesday deadline.
EFTA00018994.pdf
An email chain from March 16, 2021, involving an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The email forwards legal documents related to 'GM' (likely Ghislaine Maxwell), specifically reply memos concerning a motion to suppress evidence obtained from a 'BSF Subpoena' and arguments involving 'Martindell' (likely referencing the Martindell protective order doctrine).
EFTA00015003.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 24, 2019, between officials at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), specifically involving the Deputy Chief of the Public Corruption Unit. The emails discuss the progress of the Epstein investigation, detailing a recent trip to Fort Lauderdale where investigators interviewed two witnesses at the BSF (Boies Schiller Flexner) office, while a third witness declined to appear. The correspondence also mentions ongoing negotiations with attorney Robbie Kaplan regarding a potential interview with a high-profile individual (name redacted) who is concerned about their legal 'exposure,' with discussions moving toward an attorney proffer.
EFTA00014671.pdf
This document is a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel to Judge Alison Nathan, dated May 12, 2021, arguing for the enforcement of a subpoena for evidence controlled by the law firm Boies, Schiller, and Flexner (BSF). The defense seeks the full production of a journal kept by 'Accuser-2' in 1996, arguing that the government is relying on selective excerpts to support its case while ignoring potentially exculpatory context in the rest of the journal. The letter also addresses disputes over the production of a pair of boots and original photographs, accusing the government of interfering with the defense's investigation and practicing 'selective ignorance.'
EFTA00010708.pdf
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York dated April 9, 2019. The email discusses productive legal proceedings involving Judge McMahon and Judge Netburn, specifically regarding unsealing orders and related materials in civil cases (referenced by case numbers 17 Civ 7433 and 17 Civ 0616). Attachments include memoranda, orders, and a transcript.
EFTA00010245.pdf
This document is an email chain between an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the SDNY and support staff regarding the ingestion of digital evidence into the 'Relativity' database for the case 'US v Epstein (USAO # 2018R01618)'. The emails discuss processing two specific subpoena responses from the law firm Boies Schiller (BSF), dated March 4, 2019, and April 18, 2019. The correspondence also details technical exclusions, specifically requesting that raw DVD data files (VIDEO_TS) for interviews with individuals identified as H.R., J.H., S., A.D., and A.T. be excluded from the upload.
DOJ-OGR-00015106.jpg
This document is a legal filing (page 4 of an internal document, page 11 of the court filing) arguing for the unsealing of grand jury transcripts with specific conditions. The filing argues that while victim identities (such as Ms. Farmer) must be redacted to protect their privacy and psychological wellbeing, the Court should not 'rubber stamp' redactions for third-party affiliates of Epstein and Maxwell who have not been charged, suggesting such broad redactions would resemble a cover-up. It cites multiple legal precedents regarding privacy interests in sexual abuse cases, including *Giuffre v. Maxwell* and *Doe 1 v. JP Morgan Chase Bank*.
DOJ-OGR-00015105.jpg
This legal document argues for the unsealing of grand jury transcripts related to the Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell case, asserting that the extraordinary nature of their crimes and the victims' need for transparency outweigh standard secrecy protocols. It highlights that unsealing is necessary to expose the full scope of the abuse and the network of enablers without forcing victims to expose themselves to retaliation. The filing further contends that living witnesses, specifically the victims, actively support this disclosure rather than opposing it.
DOJ-OGR-00000770.jpg
This legal document, filed on behalf of victim Annie Farmer by her counsel Sigrid S. McCawley, argues for the unsealing of grand jury transcripts related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The filing supports redacting victims' personal information for privacy but strongly opposes redacting the names of co-conspirators and enablers, asserting that their identities should be public to ensure accountability and justice. It references other civil lawsuits against entities like JP Morgan and Deutsche Bank as part of a broader effort to hold third parties involved in the sex-trafficking scheme accountable.
DOJ-OGR-00000769.jpg
This legal document argues for the release of grand jury transcripts with narrowly tailored redactions to protect the identities of victims like Ms. Farmer, citing their strong privacy interests as established in previous cases. However, it argues against redacting the names of third parties who have not been charged or alleged to be involved in the crimes of Epstein and Maxwell, suggesting such an effort "smacks of a cover up" and requires independent court scrutiny.
DOJ-OGR-00000768.jpg
This legal document argues for the disclosure of grand jury transcripts in the case of Epstein and Maxwell. It contends that the extraordinary nature of their crimes, the vast number of victims, and the public interest in full accountability outweigh the usual need for grand jury secrecy. The filing emphasizes that unsealing the transcripts would help expose the full network of enablers without forcing victims to face further retaliation and that the victims themselves support this transparency.
DOJ-OGR-00000767.jpg
This legal document, filed on August 5, 2025, is a motion arguing for the unsealing of grand jury transcripts related to the sex-trafficking crimes of Epstein and Maxwell. The filing, made on behalf of victims, asserts that transparency is crucial for justice, public understanding, and holding all responsible parties accountable, citing legal precedent from the Second Circuit. It emphasizes the victims' desire for full disclosure to illuminate the scope of the abuse and identify those who enabled the criminal enterprise.
DOJ-OGR-00010529.jpg
This document is the final page of a legal filing submitted on June 21, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Attorney Robert Y. Lewis formally requests that Ms. Ransome and Ms. Stein be permitted to speak at Maxwell's upcoming sentencing hearing. The letter is copied to various attorneys involved in the case, including defense counsel (Cohen, Menninger, Sternheim) and DOJ prosecutors (Moe, Comey, Pomerantz).
DOJ-OGR-00010673.jpg
This document is a letter from Sigrid S. McCawley, filed as part of a legal case, likely as a victim impact statement for the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. McCawley details the profound, negative impact Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, and Wexner had on her life, describing threats, the trauma of captivity, and constant fear. She urges the court to consider Maxwell's dangerous nature, framing herself as a whistleblower who has suffered for speaking out.
DOJ-OGR-00010671.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated June 24, 2022, containing a Victim Impact Statement addressed directly to Ghislaine Maxwell. The statement, submitted by attorney Sigrid S. McCawley, details the long-term psychological trauma, nightmares, and hyper-vigilance suffered by the victim due to Maxwell's grooming and abuse. The victim confronts Maxwell about her role in arranging rapes and molestations, rejects Maxwell's past claim of being like a 'mother,' and expresses a desire for Maxwell to remain imprisoned for life.
DOJ-OGR-00010666.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing (Document 674) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on June 24, 2022. It contains a victim impact statement submitted by attorney Sigrid S. McCawley to Judge Nathan. The statement describes the professional and emotional toll of the trial on the victim, criticizes Maxwell's lack of remorse and refusal to admit guilt, and urges the judge to consider the ongoing suffering of the victims during sentencing.
DOJ-OGR-00010665.jpg
This document is a personal statement from a legal filing detailing the long-term psychological trauma, guilt, and shame experienced by a victim of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The author describes specific triggering events, such as seeing photos of Maxwell with Prince Andrew, and discusses the devastating impact the abuse had on their sister, Maria, and their entire family.
DOJ-OGR-00010650.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 2 of 2) of a legal filing from the law firm BSF (Boies Schiller Flexner), signed by attorney Sigrid S. McCawley. It was filed on June 24, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The main content of the page is redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00010616.jpg
This is the second page of a two-page legal document, part of a court filing (Document 672) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on June 24, 2022. The document is from the law firm BSF and signed by Sigrid S. McCawley, but its substantive content is redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00010614.jpg
This document is page 2 of a 2-page letter filed on June 24, 2022, as part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The letter is signed by attorney Sigrid S. McCawley of the law firm BSF (Boies Schiller Flexner), but the substantive text is entirely redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00010611.jpg
This document is page 2 of a victim impact statement filed on June 24, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Submitted by attorney Sigrid S. McCawley, the text is a first-person account from a victim detailing the lasting trauma, nightmares, and hyper-vigilance caused by Maxwell's abuse. The victim demands Maxwell spend the rest of her life in prison and vows to continue speaking out against predators.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity