DOJ-OGR-00002356.jpg

669 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 669 KB
Summary

This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, discusses Ghislaine Maxwell's depositions from April and July 2016. It outlines the terms of a Protective Order for confidential materials and describes a motion by Virginia Giuffre's lawyers (Boies Schiller) to compel Maxwell to answer questions, with assurances that her answers would remain confidential. A footnote alleges that Giuffre's side had previously leaked confidential information to the media and the government.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Maxwell
Mentioned in the context of her April and July 2016 depositions, where she testified under a Protective Order. Giuffr...
Giuffre Plaintiff
Moved to compel Maxwell to answer additional questions following a deposition. Mentioned in a footnote as the 'plaint...

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Boies Schiller Law firm
Assured the district court that questions for Maxwell were appropriate and answers would be kept confidential under t...
government Government agency
Mentioned in a footnote as a recipient of allegedly leaked confidential material.

Timeline (3 events)

2016-04
Maxwell's deposition where she agreed to testify, relying on the confidentiality protections of a Protective Order.
2016-07
Maxwell's July 2016 deposition is mentioned in a heading.
Giuffre moved to compel Maxwell to answer additional questions she had previously declined to answer.
district court

Locations (1)

Location Context
Boies Schiller assured the district court regarding the confidentiality of answers in the case.

Relationships (1)

Maxwell Adversarial (legal) Giuffre
The document describes a legal dispute where Giuffre is the plaintiff attempting to compel testimony from Maxwell, who is the deponent/defendant.

Key Quotes (2)

"[a]t the conclusion of this case, unless other arrangements are agreed upon, each document and all copies thereof which have been designated as CONFIDENTIAL shall be returned to the party that designated it CONFIDENTIAL, or the parties may elect to destroy CONFIDENTIAL documents. Where the parties agree to destroy CONFIDENTIAL documents, the destroying party shall provide all parties with an affidavit confirming destruction."
Source
— Protective Order, paragraph 12 (Quoted from a legal order to describe the rules for handling confidential materials at the end of the case.)
DOJ-OGR-00002356.jpg
Quote #1
"[s]uch questions are entirely appropriate in the discovery phase of this case, particularly where any answers will be maintained as confidential under the Protective Order in this case."
Source
— Boies Schiller (An assurance made to the district court in support of a motion to compel Maxwell to answer questions.)
DOJ-OGR-00002356.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document