Boies Schiller
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Client |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Farmer
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. ROSSMILLER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Giuffre
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Investigative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Giuffre
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Attorney’s Office
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Meeting | Ms. Farmer first met with the Boies Schiller firm when they were representing Virginia Roberts. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Hiring | Ms. Farmer hired the Boies Schiller firm. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Two civil depositions of Ghislaine Maxwell were conducted by Boies Schiller in the case of Giuffr... | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| N/A | Legal action | The Government obtained evidence from Boies Schiller via a judicially authorized grand jury subpo... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal ruling | Chief Judge McMahon permitted the Government to share a specific court order with Boies Schiller,... | Court | View |
| 2021-04-23 | Court order | Judge Alison J. Nathan granted the Government's redaction requests and ordered the Defendant and ... | N/A | View |
EFTA00032942.pdf
This document is a 'White Collar Law360' email newsletter dated February 13, 2020. It summarizes various legal news stories, including the Roger Stone sentencing, fraud cases involving Theranos and Air Charter Co., and investigations into university funding. A specific article highlights a defamation dispute between attorneys David Boies and Alan Dershowitz, centering on Boies' remarks regarding Dershowitz's alleged connections to Jeffrey Epstein.
EFTA00032906.pdf
This document is an 'Access to Justice' email newsletter from Law360 dated April 20, 2020. It aggregates various legal news stories, primarily focused on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the justice system, including court closures, remote hearings, and bankruptcy issues. It is relevant to the Epstein files because it contains a summary of a recent Eleventh Circuit ruling that the Crime Victims' Rights Act protections do not arise until after a formal criminal charge is filed, which is described as a blow to Epstein's victims.
EFTA00032757.pdf
This document consists of an internal email chain within the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated June 15-16, 2021, discussing the upcoming suppression hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence addresses legal strategy, including Maxwell's filing of 12 separate memos of law to evade page limits, and clarifies the identity of Stan Pottinger as a lawyer from Boies Schiller who represented a plaintiff in a related civil action. The emails also reference previous proceedings before Judge Sweet and Judge McMahon.
EFTA00032738.pdf
This document is a Law360 email newsletter from June 17, 2021, summarizing various legal news stories in New York. A key item reports that Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys complained to a judge about prison conditions, specifically alleging that feces rained down in her cell and guards listened to privileged conversations. Other stories cover Greenberg Traurig lobbying for a bill aiding a Russian oligarch, various financial settlements, and legal industry news.
EFTA00030992.pdf
This document is a discovery letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated August 21, 2020. It outlines the production of various evidentiary materials, including Boies Schiller documents, emails, search warrant photos, Jeffrey Epstein's deposition recordings (2010), travel records, and SORNA records. The letter explicitly notes that 'highly confidential' materials containing sexualized images are being provided only to counsel, not the defendant, and refuses to produce a separate FBI obstruction file regarding a redacted former employee of Epstein deemed irrelevant to the case.
EFTA00030281.pdf
This document is a Law360 New York email newsletter dated July 15, 2019. The top stories focus on Jeffrey Epstein's legal battles, specifically highlighting that potential child pornography found in his home could derail his bail bid, and federal allegations that he paid $350,000 to influence witnesses. The newsletter also covers various other legal developments involving SunEdison, L'Oreal, Donald Trump's financial subpoenas, and various corporate lawsuits.
EFTA00029844.pdf
Defense counsel Laura Menninger objects to government redactions in the case US v. Maxwell. Menninger argues that 'Accuser-2's' diary entries are not confidential as they were shared on a NY Times podcast and do not implicate Maxwell. The letter also argues against redacting information about another accuser (name redacted) who has publicized her allegations via Netflix and podcasts, referencing the 'Kramer notes', and discusses sealing issues related to Maxwell's deposition in a separate civil case ruled on by Judge Preska.
EFTA00028929.pdf
This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, requesting the suppression of evidence obtained from a government subpoena to Boies Schiller and dismissal of counts five and six. It includes a Table of Contents, Table of Authorities citing various legal cases and rules, and a Table of Exhibits detailing communications and notes related to the case from 2016 to 2021, many involving AUSAs and individuals like Peter Skinner, Stan Pottinger, Brad Edwards, and Sigrid McCawley. The memorandum argues that the government misled the court and that the evidence should be suppressed due to due process violations.
EFTA00025398.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 2020 between the DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). OPR is seeking to interview 32 individuals regarding their historical contacts (2005-2008) with the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL) and FBI Miami concerning the Epstein case. SDNY agrees to the interviews but requests that OPR avoid discussing the substance of the underlying criminal scheme or interactions with Epstein to avoid interfering with SDNY's active investigation, noting that any relevant statements must be handled as '3500 material' (Jencks Act). The correspondence lists the legal representation for the 32 individuals, noting the majority are represented by Brad Edwards.
EFTA00023047.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Motion' filed on January 25, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in the Southern District of New York. The motion seeks to suppress all evidence obtained from a government subpoena to the law firm Boies Schiller and to dismiss Counts Five and Six of the indictment, citing the Due Process Clause. The document lists the legal counsel representing Maxwell.
EFTA00020781.pdf
This document is an internal Department of Justice email chain from March 2019 regarding the technical processing of evidence for the case 'US v. Epstein' (Case #2018R01618). An Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY) requests the uploading of subpoena returns from the law firm Boies Schiller (BSF) into the Relativity review platform. The technical staff discusses issues with DVD-formatted video files (VIDEO_TS folders) and specific interviews/walkthrough videos that require conversion or exclusion from the database.
EFTA00020780.pdf
An email dated March 25, 2019, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York requesting the upload of subpoena response documents from the law firm Boies Schiller (BSF) into the Relativity database for the case US v. Epstein (2018R01618). The email specifies a network file path on the DOJ cloud server containing the documents and outlines the desired folder structure for the upload relative to the 'FBI Case File'.
EFTA00019549.pdf
This document is an internal Department of Justice email chain from March 2019 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and technical support staff. The correspondence concerns the uploading of digital evidence into the 'Relativity' e-discovery platform for the case 'US v. Epstein' (Case # 2018R01618). Specifically, the attorney requests the creation of a folder structure to house the 'first subpoena response' received from the law firm Boies Schiller, dated March 4, 2019.
EFTA00019095.pdf
An email thread from March 30, 2021, among DOJ officials discussing a Westlaw alert for a 'supposedly sealed order' related to Jeffrey Epstein and Boies Schiller. The thread clarifies that the document is actually a 2019 order recently unsealed in which Judge Netburn denied an application to modify a protective order in a civil case. The participants express confusion initially about why a sealed order appeared public.
EFTA00018654.pdf
This document is a 'Law360 White Collar' email newsletter from December 5, 2018. It details various legal news stories, including Jeffrey Epstein settling a dispute with an attorney representing his victims to avoid trial testimony. Other stories cover Michael Flynn's cooperation with the Mueller investigation, the Panama Papers indictments, and various fraud and securities cases.
EFTA00016492.pdf
Email correspondence from November 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Bobbi Sternheim, et al.). The prosecution confirms they spoke with David Boies and Sigrid McCawley, who denied reports that their client (name redacted) intended to give press briefings during the upcoming trial, affirming compliance with court rules regarding extrajudicial statements.
EFTA00015277.pdf
This document is an email chain from June 2021 between US Attorneys in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell case. They discuss preparation for a suppression hearing, exchange legal documents including transcripts from Judge Sweet and Magistrate Judge Netburn, and identify Stan Pottinger as a lawyer from Boies Schiller who represented a civil plaintiff. The prosecutors also express frustration with the defense filing 12 separate memos of law (MOLs) to evade page limits.
EFTA00014496.pdf
This document contains an email chain between a partner at Edwards Pottinger LLC and likely federal authorities (SDNY/FBI) from late 2018/early 2019. The correspondence outlines preparations for a new investigation or prosecution, including requests for victim lists beyond those in the original Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Crucially, it provides a comprehensive list of lawyers who represented Jeffrey Epstein, his pilots, staff, and Ghislaine Maxwell, noting that Bruce Reinhart (now a magistrate judge) represented the pilots and staff.
EFTA00010410.pdf
This document contains an email chain between defense attorney Christian Everdell and US Attorney's Office prosecutors (Lara Pomerantz, Maurene Comey, et al.) dated June 30, 2021, regarding the case USA v. Maxwell. The correspondence confirms that the defense has no redactions to propose regarding a court opinion and coordinates the filing of a joint letter to the court. The document also includes the official Notice of Electronic Filing (Order 305) from Judge Alison J. Nathan, which set the deadlines for these redaction proposals.
DOJ-OGR-00020670.jpg
This document is a court docket log from the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York, detailing filings from July and August 2021. Key events include letters filed by Maxwell's defense team, a motion to suppress evidence, and a significant order from Judge Alison J. Nathan admonishing attorney David Markus for writing an op-ed about the case. The log culminates with the court denying Maxwell's supplemental pre-trial motions.
DOJ-OGR-00020530.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from July to August 2021 detailing legal maneuvers in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Significant entries involve a dispute over an Op-Ed written by attorney David Oscar Markus, leading to a court order enforcing Local Criminal Rule 23.1 regarding extrajudicial statements to protect the integrity of the trial. Additionally, the defense filed motions referencing the 'Cosby Opinion' and sought to suppress evidence obtained from a subpoena to the law firm Boies Schiller.
DOJ-OGR-00020429.jpg
This document is a court docket summary from July and August 2021 for the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. It details a series of filings, including letters from Maxwell's counsel and motions from the U.S. government. A significant event is the court's order addressing an op-ed written by attorney David Markus, which led to him being ordered to comply with local rules regarding extrajudicial statements that could prejudice a trial.
DOJ-OGR-00020419.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket in Case 22-1426, dated July 8, 2022, detailing filings and orders from April 23, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries, overseen by Judge Alison J. Nathan, primarily concern letters and motions from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense regarding proposed redactions to documents and motions to suppress evidence. The judge grants several redaction requests from both sides, citing legal precedent to balance public access with privacy interests, and orders the redacted documents to be filed.
DOJ-OGR-00002360.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, argues that the government's prior representations about its investigation were false. It details how attorneys from Boies Schiller, including David Boies himself, approached the government in 2016 to urge an investigation into Epstein and Maxwell for sex trafficking and perjury, providing evidence from abused clients. A quote from David Boies highlights his firm's conviction that they could prove a "massive sex trafficking ring" was in operation.
DOJ-OGR-00002360(3).jpg
This legal document page, filed on February 4, 2021, argues that the government was aware of information beyond public filings when it began its investigation. It cites a February 29, 2016 meeting where attorneys from Boies Schiller urged AUSA Amanda Kramer to investigate Epstein and Maxwell, and a later approach in summer 2016 by David Boies himself asking the government to consider perjury charges against Maxwell. The document includes a quote from Boies stating they had evidence of a "massive sex trafficking ring."
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity