DOJ-OGR-00021764.jpg

705 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
4
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 705 KB
Summary

This legal document argues that Juror 50 should have been disqualified from jury duty due to his failure to disclose his own history of child sexual abuse during voir dire. The document details how Juror 50's traumatic experiences, revealed in a post-verdict hearing, significantly paralleled the abuse described by the government's key witnesses at trial, suggesting he was incapable of being impartial.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Juror 50 Juror
The central figure of this document page, whose past trauma as a victim of child sexual abuse is argued to be grounds...
Juror 50's stepbrother Family member / Abuser
Mentioned as one of the people familiar to Juror 50 who sexually abused him.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
Government government agency
Mentioned in reference to "the Government’s four key victim witnesses at trial."

Timeline (4 events)

A trial where four key victim witnesses for the government testified about abuse.
Government four key victim witnesses
A post-verdict hearing where Juror 50 gave explanations and disclosed facts about his sexual abuse.
Voir Dire (jury selection) where it is argued Juror 50 should have disclosed his traumatic experience.
Child sexual abuse of Juror 50, which occurred when he was a minor, on multiple occasions over several years, by his stepbrother and two friends.
Juror 50 Juror 50's stepbrother two people who were friends

Relationships (1)

Juror 50 familial / abuser-victim Juror 50's stepbrother
The document states that Juror 50 was "sexually abused by someone familiar to him, namely his stepbrother."

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document