DOJ-OGR-00013864.jpg
544 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
1
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
544 KB
Summary
This document is a transcript from a court hearing on August 10, 2022. The judge provides guidance on witness testimony, confirms the preclusion of testimony from Mr. Scarola and Mr. Edwards, and addresses a government objection to admitting a 1996 sale agreement for a London property as evidence. The discussion involves several attorneys, including Mr. Pagliuca, Mr. Rohrbach, and Mr. Everdell.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Glassman | Witness |
Mentioned in the context of his testimony potentially impeaching Jane.
|
| Jane |
Mentioned as a person who could be impeached by Mr. Glassman's testimony.
|
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, identified as being from the government.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, asking for clarification on the preclusion of testimony.
|
| Mr. Scarola | Witness |
His testimony is being precluded by the court.
|
| Mr. Edwards | Witness |
His testimony is being precluded by the court.
|
| The Court | Judge |
A speaker in the transcript, making rulings and guiding the proceedings.
|
| Mr. Everdell | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, confirming an exhibit has a trial mark.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (2 events)
1996
A sale agreement was made for the defendant's house in London.
44 Kinnerton Street, London
defendant
2022-08-10
A court proceeding where the judge issued guidance on witness testimony, precluded testimony from two witnesses (Scarola and Edwards), and discussed a government objection to an exhibit.
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the defendant's home mentioned in a sale agreement.
|
|
|
The address of the defendant's home in London.
|
Relationships (3)
Mr. Pagliuca, an attorney, is addressing the Court (the judge) to seek clarification on a ruling during a legal proceeding.
Mr. Rohrbach, an attorney for the government, is addressing the Court during a legal proceeding.
Mr. Everdell, an attorney, is responding to a direct question from the Court about an exhibit.
Key Quotes (3)
"You're precluding testimony from Mr. Scarola and Mr. Edwards."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Seeking clarification from the judge on a ruling about witness testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00013864.jpg
Quote #1
"Yes, on the 401/403 grounds."Source
— THE COURT
(Confirming the preclusion of testimony and stating the legal grounds for the decision.)
DOJ-OGR-00013864.jpg
Quote #2
"There's a government objection to preclude, pursuant to Rule 16, an exhibit that I gather purports to be a sale agreement for the defendant's home in -- house in London at 44 Kinnerton Street dated 1996."Source
— THE COURT
(Describing an objection from the government regarding a piece of evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00013864.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document