Mr. Edwards
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Adversarial |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Interrogator deponent |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. SCAROLA
|
Professional collaborative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Unknown Witness (Speaker A)
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the witness
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS (Deponent)
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Chauntae Davies
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE DOE NO. 2
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Boise
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Boies Schiller
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE DOE NO. 1
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Affiant (Police Officer)
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
other people
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Anouska De Georgiou
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Speaker
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Speaker
|
Co counsel co petitioners |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Speaker
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Brittany Henderson
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Paul Cassell
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Decision made by counsel to seek the joinder of Miss Roberts and Jane Doe 4 as parties. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of an unnamed witness conducted by Mr. Edwards, with Mr. Pagliuca present as counsel. ... | Not mentioned | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition testimony regarding sexual allegations and legal waivers. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Meeting | A meeting where the witness's immigration status and a U visa form were discussed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Attorneys learned Ms. Giuffre was in the US and willing to testify. | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition testimony regarding statements made about Virginia Roberts. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Attempted deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of a legal pleading/motion to join. | Legal Court (implied) | View |
| N/A | Deposition | A prior deposition where Mr. Alessi was questioned by Mr. Edwards. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Cross-examination of witness A. Farmer in court case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-12-13 | Legal motion | Ms. Maxwell's legal team requests permission from the Court to call Mr. Scarola, Mr. Edwards, and... | Court | View |
| 2019-09-03 | N/A | Court Hearing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-09-03 | Court hearing | A court proceeding where a victim, identified as Jane Doe No. 2, begins to give her testimony reg... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2019-09-03 | Court hearing | Victim impact statements are being delivered in court regarding the case against Jeffrey Epstein.... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2019-09-03 | Court hearing | Victims provide statements in a court proceeding related to Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. | N/A | View |
| 2019-09-03 | Court hearing | Anouska De Georgiou provides a victim impact statement in court. | Southern District Court | View |
| 2015-10-15 | N/A | Deposition of Alan Dershowitz | Unknown | View |
| 2014-05-01 | N/A | Affiant flew to Florida for a full-day interview with Ms. Giuffre. | Fort Lauderdale, Florida | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Filing of case under Crime Victims Rights Act | Unknown | View |
| 2007-01-01 | N/A | Initial legal action filed by Mr. Edwards and the speaker. | District Court | View |
| 2007-01-01 | N/A | Filing of a petition seeking access to and invalidation of Epstein's nonprosecution agreement. | District Court | View |
EFTA00013876.pdf
This document contains an email chain between officials at the U.S. Attorney's Office dated October 29, 2008. An Assistant U.S. Attorney in West Palm Beach inquires about how to handle a letter requesting the 'entire file' on Epstein, noting the letter did not reference FOIA. The responder advises construing the request as a FOIA request and mentions a delay in their own correspondence due to military leave.
DOJ-OGR-00018183.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing a lawyer, Mr. Pagliuca, cross-examining a witness named Alessi. Mr. Pagliuca reads from a prior deposition where the witness was questioned by Mr. Edwards, Virginia Roberts' lawyer, about a trip to Mar-a-Lago. The testimony reveals the witness gave conflicting dates (2000 and summer 2002) for when they went to pick up Virginia Roberts from the location.
DOJ-OGR-00008372.jpg
This document is the final page of a legal filing (Document 544) from December 13, 2021, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan. Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell assert her constitutional right to call Mr. Scarola, Mr. Edwards, and Mr. Glassman as witnesses. The page includes the contact information for her legal counsel from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00008370.jpg
This legal document, dated December 13, 2021, argues that testimony from attorney Robert Glassman is not protected by attorney-client privilege. It focuses on a discrepancy in a witness's ('Jane') memory, where she claimed Mr. Epstein took her to see 'The Lion King' on Broadway in 1994, three years before it premiered. The document details communications between AUSA Rossmiller and Mr. Glassman where the government pointed out the error, but Jane insisted her story was correct.
DOJ-OGR-00008365.jpg
This legal document, dated December 13, 2021, is a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The defense argues that the Court should permit the testimony of three witnesses—Mr. Scarola, Mr. Edwards, and Mr. Glassman—to establish motive and bias of Maxwell's accusers, after the government refused to stipulate. The document details the proposed testimony of attorney Jack Scarola, including his prior representation of an accuser named 'Carolyn' in a civil suit against Jeffrey Epstein and his communications with the government.
DOJ-OGR-00000686.jpg
This page is a transcript from a court hearing dated September 3, 2019, in the case United States v. Epstein. It concludes a victim impact statement expressing frustration over Epstein's suicide escaping justice, but gratitude for the handling of the current case compared to the past. Attorney Mr. Edwards then addresses the court, referencing a 2008 case filed under the Crime Victims Rights Act and introducing his co-counsel, former judge Paul Cassell.
DOJ-OGR-00000685.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court hearing dated September 3, 2019, related to the case against Jeffrey Epstein following his death. It features a concluding statement from an unnamed victim expressing relief that Epstein can no longer harm anyone, followed by attorney Mr. Edwards introducing a letter from an absent client, Michelle Licata. Ms. Licata's statement, read by Brittany Henderson, describes abuse occurring while she was in high school and criticizes the government for the previous 'secret deal' (Non-Prosecution Agreement) made with Epstein without her knowledge.
DOJ-OGR-00000684.jpg
This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, containing a victim impact statement from Anouska De Georgiou. She recounts being introduced to Jeffrey Epstein as a hopeful teenager and subsequently being manipulated, coerced, and sexually abused by him for years. De Georgiou describes the lasting damage to her life and ability to form relationships, and expresses solidarity with all of Epstein's other victims.
DOJ-OGR-00000681.jpg
This document is a partial court transcript from September 3, 2019, featuring the testimony of Chauntae Davies. She describes being mentally and physically traumatized, meeting Jeffrey Epstein through her massage teacher, becoming his apprentice, and being recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell. Davies details how Epstein and Maxwell took her in, provided education and a job, and facilitated global travel, while also revealing her struggle with Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome.
DOJ-OGR-00000678.jpg
This document is page 40 of a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019, regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case (1:19-cr-00490-RMB). It contains a victim impact statement from an unnamed former model who describes being sexually assaulted by Epstein, receiving money immediately after the act, and subsequently suffering from depression and leaving the modeling industry. The transcript concludes with Mr. Edwards introducing another victim, Jane Doe No. 4, who begins her statement.
DOJ-OGR-00000677.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where victims are giving statements. An unidentified speaker discusses the societal problem of victim-blaming. Another victim, Jane Doe No. 3, begins her testimony, recounting how she moved to New York City 15 years prior to pursue modeling and was subsequently introduced to Mr. Epstein by a woman who portrayed him as someone who could help her career.
DOJ-OGR-00000675.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019, related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. It shows an attorney, Mr. Edwards, introducing his client as 'Jane Doe 2' to the court. Jane Doe 2 then begins her victim impact statement, speaking about the widespread nature of the trauma, the 'Me Too' movement, and her intention to address the difficult question of why victims stayed in the abusive situation.
DOJ-OGR-00000673.jpg
This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, containing victim impact statements in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. Courtney Wild identifies herself as a victim of Epstein's sexual abuse for years, accusing him of manipulating the justice system and calling him a coward for dying before he could be confronted in court. An attorney, Mr. Edwards, then introduces his client, Jane Doe No. 1, who begins her own statement by referencing Epstein's death.
DOJ-OGR-00000668.jpg
This document is page 30 of a court transcript from September 3, 2019, regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (United States v. Jeffrey Epstein). Attorney Mr. Edwards addresses the court regarding his clients (victims) who wish to speak, establishing protocols for those who wish to remain anonymous ('Jane Doe'). Edwards also acknowledges presentations made by attorneys Weingarten and Weinberg, expressing professional respect for Weinberg despite the adversarial nature of the case, and references the 'tragic ending' (Epstein's death) in relation to potential civil rights violations.
DOJ-OGR-00000667.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court hearing on September 3, 2019. The judge asks counsel for the victims, Mr. Edwards and Mr. Boise, to follow certain procedures. Attorney Brad Edwards, from the firm Edwards Pottinger, identifies himself and states that he represents 15 victims present in the courtroom and at least 20 others who could not attend, citing reasons such as fear of public exposure.
DOJ-OGR-00018476.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning focuses on whether she has discussed her alleged abuse by Epstein with other victims and probes her memory of a meeting with the government concerning her U visa application, which her lawyer, Mr. Edwards, attended. The witness states she has not discussed her experiences with others and does not recall specific details about the meeting or her lawyer's actions during it.
DOJ-OGR-00016488.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The court discusses the preclusion of testimony from witnesses Mr. Scarola and Mr. Edwards on 401/403 grounds, allowing the defense to release them. Additionally, the court addresses a government objection to a defense exhibit regarding a 1996 sale agreement for the defendant's home at 44 Kinnerton Street in London.
DOJ-OGR-00016391.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer, concerning a separate civil case. The witness confirms that lawyers Ms. McCawley and Mr. Edwards, some from the firm Boies Schiller, represent Virginia Roberts, and that the witness was prepared to testify in that civil litigation.
DOJ-OGR-00013864.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court hearing on August 10, 2022. The judge provides guidance on witness testimony, confirms the preclusion of testimony from Mr. Scarola and Mr. Edwards, and addresses a government objection to admitting a 1996 sale agreement for a London property as evidence. The discussion involves several attorneys, including Mr. Pagliuca, Mr. Rohrbach, and Mr. Everdell.
DOJ-OGR-00013767.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on Farmer's communications with other accusers of 'Epstein', confirming their participation in a WhatsApp group and direct email exchanges with other accusers, including Virginia Roberts. The transcript highlights the interconnectedness and communication channels among the accusers.
DOJ-OGR-00013766.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on the witness's knowledge of lawyers Ms. McCawley and Mr. Edwards, from the firm Boies Schiller, representing Virginia Roberts in a separate civil litigation. The witness confirms their knowledge and that they were prepared to testify in that case, despite an objection for relevance which the court overruled.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017519.jpg
This document contains pages 114-117 of a deposition transcript, likely of Scott Rothstein. The witness admits to running a Ponzi scheme where he sold fake legal settlements to investors. He utilized legitimate legal cases involving Jeffrey Epstein (specifically cases involving underage girls) as 'props' to pitch to investors, making up fictitious details about settlements. He states he did not care about the background of the victims (whether they were underage or had histories of prostitution) because the settlements were fake. He also implicates Russell Adler as a co-conspirator who provided details about plaintiffs traveling on Epstein's plane.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017509.jpg
A deposition transcript involving a witness (likely Scott Rothstein, based on context of Ponzi scheme and Ken Jenne association) being questioned by 'Tonja'. The witness admits to running a Ponzi scheme and discusses using the Epstein case flight manifest—containing 'big names'—as a tool to convince investors of the case's value. The witness also recalls conversations with Ken Jenne regarding a confidential informant in their office and confirms hiring a man named Wayne Black.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017501.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript (Pages 42-45) of an individual admitting to running a Ponzi scheme. The witness discusses using the legitimacy of the 'Epstein case' to sell fictitious settlements to investors. The witness recalls being told by associate Russ Adler that Jeffrey Epstein had flown Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew on his plane, information used to impress investors. The witness admits to leaving investors alone in an office (without cameras) to view 'real pleadings' in the Epstein case to verify the scheme's legitimacy. The text also references email communications with Ken Jenne regarding the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017498.jpg
This document contains pages 30-33 of a deposition transcript, likely of Scott Rothstein (evidenced by mentions of 'RRA entities' and 'Adler'). The witness details the extensive surveillance system installed in their law firm, including cameras in hallways and the shareholder's lounge. Crucially, the witness explicitly admits to engaging in 'significant amount of illegal activity' and hiring former law enforcement (including Ken Jenne) to engender support for these illegal activities and to perform both legitimate and illegitimate tasks.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Firm/Ponzi funds | Mr. Edwards | $0.00 | Bonuses paid to Mr. Edwards. | View |
When Jane met Jeffrey Epstein and Glen Maxwell
In a prior deposition, Mr. Edwards asked Mr. Alessi what year Jane met Jeffrey Epstein and Glen Maxwell. Alessi's answer was recalled as being around '99, 2000, or 2002.
Photographs taken by an unnamed male subject ('he').
Mr. Edwards questions the witness about a prior statement regarding 'pictures of teenage girls'. The witness confirms 'he' took naked photos of her and showed her photos of other 'young women in the bathtub'. Mr. Pagliuca objects to the questions.
Photographs taken by an unnamed male subject ('he').
Mr. Edwards questions the witness about a prior statement regarding 'pictures of teenage girls'. The witness confirms 'he' took naked photos of her and showed her photos of other 'young women in the bathtub'. Mr. Pagliuca objects to the questions.
Photographs taken by an unnamed male subject
Mr. Edwards questions the witness about a prior statement regarding pictures of teenage girls. The witness confirms the unnamed male took naked photos of them and showed them photos of other young women in a bathtub. Mr. Pagliuca makes objections during the questioning.
When Jane met Jeffrey Epstein and Glen Maxwell
In a prior deposition, Mr. Edwards asked Mr. Alessi what year Jane met Jeffrey Epstein and Glen Maxwell. Alessi's answer was recalled as being around '99, 2000, or 2002.
Victim Statements and Anonymity
Discussion regarding clients addressing the court, the use of 'Jane Doe' for anonymity, and response to defense presentations.
Civil cases representation
Discussion regarding representing Giuffre in civil cases against abusers.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity