HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017303.jpg

2.09 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Book manuscript / memoir draft
File Size: 2.09 MB
Summary

This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (possibly by Alan Dershowitz) discussing the moral conflict of a defense attorney. The author recounts a specific legal victory involving the 'Hurok bombing' where he utilized the status of an informant, Sheldon Seigel, and an unlawful wiretap to secure the release of clients he knew were guilty of killing a woman named Iris Kones. The text details the judge's anger directed at the attorney and the attorney's lingering guilt over the 'legally proper' but unjust result.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Narrator Defense Attorney
The author of the text (likely Alan Dershowitz based on context of Hurok bombing defense), reflecting on the guilt of...
Iris Kones Victim
Innocent young woman killed in the Hurok bombing.
Sheldon Seigel (Siegel) Informer / Defendant
His status as an informer and unlawful wiretap discovery led to the case dismissal. Died young after a heart transplant.
Trial Judge Judge
Forced to release the defendants; scolded the lawyer for being responsible for injustice.
Client / Co-defendants Defendants
Perpetrators of the bombing who admitted guilt but were set free due to legal technicalities.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
United States Court of Appeals
Issued the ruling ordering the trial judge to set the defendants free.
Harvard University
Institution where Iris Kones' family is active.
House Oversight Committee
Source of the document production (Footer stamp).

Timeline (3 events)

Past Event
Release of defendants in Hurok bombing case
Courtroom
Narrator Judge Defendants
Past Event
Death of Sheldon Seigel
Not specified
Sheldon Seigel
Past Event (1972 context implied)
Hurok bombing
Not specified in text
Defendants Iris Kones

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location where the judge released the defendants and delivered the admonishment.

Relationships (3)

Narrator Attorney/Victim Iris Kones
Narrator feels responsible for freeing the men who killed her.
Narrator Attorney/Client or Informant Sheldon Seigel
Narrator used Seigel's status to win the case.
Iris Kones' Family Adversarial/Social Narrator
Family constantly reminds narrator of his role in freeing the murderers.

Key Quotes (4)

"Do you know who isn’t in court today? Iris Kones."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017303.jpg
Quote #1
"And you are responsible."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017303.jpg
Quote #2
"I suspect there were others as well, but I can’t be absolutely sure of any but Iris Kones, because my client in that case told me, and the world, that he was guilty."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017303.jpg
Quote #3
"His premature death didn’t make me feel any less responsible for the unjust, but legally proper, result I helped produce on his case."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017303.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document