United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-25 | N/A | Denial of Petition for Rehearing | New York, NY | View |
DOJ-OGR-00021061.jpg
This page is a Table of Authorities (page xiii) from a legal filing in Case 22-1426 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 28, 2023. It lists citations to various federal statutes and rules referenced in the main document, most notably 18 U.S.C. statutes related to sex trafficking (§ 1591), sexual exploitation of children (§ 2251), and transportation of minors for illegal sexual activity (§ 2423). The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00021709.jpg
This page from a 2023 appellate filing (likely by the government) argues that Ghislaine Maxwell's convictions on Counts Three and Four properly qualify as offenses involving sexual abuse of a child, citing testimony from a victim named 'Jane.' It also begins a section defending the District Court's decision regarding 'Juror 50,' who failed to disclose his own history of childhood sexual abuse during jury selection.
DOJ-OGR-00019663.jpg
This document is page 17 of a legal brief filed on October 8, 2020, in Case 20-3061 (likely the 2nd Circuit appeal). It argues that Ghislaine Maxwell should be allowed to challenge the government's investigative methods before Judge Nathan and that deposition materials should remain sealed to preserve this challenge. The text references a dispute over a protective order and cites Rule 6(e) regarding grand jury witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00009698.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' page (page 'vi') from a court filing dated March 11, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It lists various legal precedents (case law) cited in the filing, primarily from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals and the Southern District of New York. The page does not contain narrative details regarding Epstein's activities but rather serves as a legal reference list for arguments made in the full brief.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017675.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017675). It contains an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article discussing the Jencks Act and Rule 16, specifically arguing that criminal defendants do not have a right to pre-trial discovery of government witness names (including victims) in order to prevent witness tampering and intimidation. The text cites numerous federal cases to support the argument that witness lists are generally protected from early disclosure.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017288.jpg
A document dated April 2, 2012, appearing to be a draft article or legal commentary regarding the case of Jonathan Doody. It discusses the reversal of Doody's conviction by the Supreme Court (often associated with the Buddhist Temple Massacre case, though not explicitly named here) and criticizes the State of Arizona for planning a retrial and setting an unattainable $5 million bail. The text argues that Doody is being denied justice despite appellate courts ruling in his favor regarding a false confession.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity