DOJ-OGR-00002706.jpg

638 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

9
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 638 KB
Summary

This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, is an argument from the defense demanding the immediate production of unredacted reports from the government. The defense contends these reports, held by the FBI, contain exculpatory 'Brady material' and that the government cannot fulfill its disclosure obligations by providing redacted versions. The argument is supported by citations to legal precedents, including Kyles v. Whitley, and a prior ruling from the court on the timing of such disclosures.

People (9)

Name Role Context
Kyles Party in a legal case
Mentioned in the case citation 'Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 437 (1995)'.
Whitley Party in a legal case
Mentioned in the case citation 'Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 437 (1995)'.
Torres Party in a legal case
Mentioned in the case citation 'United States v. Torres, 719 F.2d 549, 555-56 (2d Cir. 1983)'.
Jones Party in a legal case
Mentioned in the case citation 'Jones v. Jago, 575 F.2d 1164, 1168 (6th Cir. 1978)'.
Jago Party in a legal case
Mentioned in the case citation 'Jones v. Jago, 575 F.2d 1164, 1168 (6th Cir. 1978)'.
Clemmons Party in a legal case
Mentioned in the case citation 'Clemmons v. Delo, 124 F.3d 944, 952 (8th Cir. 1997)'.
Delo Party in a legal case
Mentioned in the case citation 'Clemmons v. Delo, 124 F.3d 944, 952 (8th Cir. 1997)'.
White Party in a legal case
Mentioned in the case citation 'White v. Helling, 194 F.3d 937, 944 (8th Cir. 1999)'.
Helling Party in a legal case
Mentioned in the case citation 'White v. Helling, 194 F.3d 937, 944 (8th Cir. 1999)'.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
FBI Government agency
The defense argues the government can obtain unredacted copies of reports from the FBI.
DOJ Government agency
Appears in the footer document identifier 'DOJ-OGR-00002706'.

Timeline (2 events)

2021-02-04
Document 148 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN.
The defense is arguing that the government must produce unredacted reports containing Brady material immediately.
Court
government defense

Relationships (1)

Government Adversarial (legal) Defense
The document details a dispute between the government (prosecution) and the defense over the disclosure of evidence, specifically the government's Brady obligations.

Key Quotes (2)

"has a duty to learn of any favorable evidence known to the others acting on the government’s behalf in the case, including the police"
Source
— Kyles v. Whitley legal precedent (Cited to support the argument that the government is responsible for obtaining evidence from agencies like the police.)
DOJ-OGR-00002706.jpg
Quote #1
"The Government must disclose to the defense all information ‘favorable to an accused’ that is ‘material either to guilt or to punishment’ and that is known to the Government. . . . The Government shall disclose such information to the defense promptly after its existence becomes known to the Government so that the defense may make effective use of the information in the preparation of its case."
Source
— The Court (Quoted as a ruling from the Court establishing the government's obligation for prompt Brady disclosures.)
DOJ-OGR-00002706.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document