DOJ-OGR-00019420.jpg

659 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 659 KB
Summary

This page from a legal document argues that an appeal by Ms. Maxwell should be heard before her criminal trial concludes, otherwise it will become moot. The argument centers on her need to share information with Judge Preska for an ongoing unsealing process, a situation the author distinguishes from legal precedents like Caparros and Pappas.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Ms. Maxwell Appellant
The subject of the legal argument, who seeks to provide documents under seal to judicial officers and share informati...
Judge Preska Judge
The decisionmaker in an unsealing process, with whom Ms. Maxwell seeks to share information.
Caparros
Referenced as a legal case precedent that is being distinguished from Ms. Maxwell's current case.
Pappas Defendant
Referenced as a legal case precedent involving a defendant prohibited from disclosing classified information.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
the government government agency
Mentioned as a party in the Pappas case from which the defendant obtained classified information.
Court judicial body
Mentioned in the context of the Pappas case, where it dismissed part of an appeal but accepted jurisdiction over anot...

Timeline (3 events)

An appeal by Ms. Maxwell which is argued will become moot if review awaits a final judgment in the criminal case.
An unsealing process overseen by Judge Preska, for which Ms. Maxwell seeks permission to share information.
A criminal trial involving Ms. Maxwell.

Relationships (1)

Ms. Maxwell professional Judge Preska
Ms. Maxwell seeks to provide information to Judge Preska to aid in the judge's decisionmaking during an unsealing process.

Key Quotes (1)

"re-seal"
Source
— Unknown (Used to describe the impossibility of reversing the unsealing of a document if Judge Preska acts prematurely without all the facts.)
DOJ-OGR-00019420.jpg
Quote #1

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document