DOJ-OGR-00014932.jpg
680 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
680 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, detailing the direct examination of a Dr. Rocchio. Dr. Rocchio discusses academic literature concerning 'grooming models,' referencing articles by Winters, Bennett, and O'Donohue. He explains that Winters' study attempted to statistically validate behaviors agreed upon by experts and begins to define 'error rates' in psychology using the analogy of a clinical drug trial.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rocchio | Witness (Doctor) |
Mentioned in the header as the person undergoing direct examination ("Rocchio - Direct") and addressed as "Dr. Rocchi...
|
| Bennett | Author |
Mentioned as a co-author of an article whose concerns are being discussed.
|
| O'Donohue | Author |
Mentioned as a co-author of an article with Bennett.
|
| Winters | Author |
Mentioned as the author of an article that attempted to address concerns raised by the Bennett and O'Donohue article,...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2025-01-15
Direct examination of Dr. Rocchio in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
Courtroom (implied)
Dr. Rocchio
Unnamed Questioner
Relationships (3)
Winters wrote an article that responded to concerns raised in an article by Bennett and O'Donohue.
Key Quotes (2)
"The article we looked at earlier by Winters attempted specifically to address some concerns. So she attempted to validate the grooming model."Source
— Dr. Rocchio
(Explaining how a recent article by Winters responds to concerns raised in a previous article by Bennett and O'Donohue.)
DOJ-OGR-00014932.jpg
Quote #1
"So I think when we talk about error rates within the field of psychology, the kind of gold standard is when you have a particular technique or a drug and you ideally would randomly assign people, one who receives the drug, one who doesn't receive the drug, and I would kind of compare whether -- how effective it is."Source
— Dr. Rocchio
(Beginning to explain the concept of error rates in psychological studies by comparing it to a clinical drug trial.)
DOJ-OGR-00014932.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document