Bennett
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
O'Donohue
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Winters
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | A hallucination or described event where a cocktail party transforms into a scene with lizard-lik... | House cocktail party / The ... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00017958.jpg
This document is page 85 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of an expert witness named Rocchio, who confirms they are testifying as a 'blind expert' regarding the topic of grooming and subject matter expertise, without having evaluated any specific parties or witnesses in the case. The questioning explores potential professional disagreements with other experts like Dr. Dietz and Dr. O'Donohue.
DOJ-OGR-00015010.jpg
This document is a court transcript from January 15, 2025, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio. An attorney questions Rocchio about the scientific validity and testing of a sexual grooming model (SGM), referencing the model's authors' calls for more rigorous testing. The attorney also brings up an article by Bennett and O'Donohue to suggest a lack of scientific consensus on the definition of grooming.
DOJ-OGR-00014932.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, detailing the direct examination of a Dr. Rocchio. Dr. Rocchio discusses academic literature concerning 'grooming models,' referencing articles by Winters, Bennett, and O'Donohue. He explains that Winters' study attempted to statistically validate behaviors agreed upon by experts and begins to define 'error rates' in psychology using the analogy of a clinical drug trial.
DOJ-OGR-00021559.jpg
This legal document is a transcript from a court proceeding where a judge is ruling on objections from the defense. The judge overrules objections to the inclusion of testimony from a victim named Carolyn regarding a sexual assault by Epstein, stating that her testimony is credible. The judge also overrules objections to considering information about the defendant's severed perjury charges for sentencing, concluding that the defendant's 2016 sworn testimony denying knowledge of Epstein's scheme is reliable information for the court to consider.
DOJ-OGR-00005640.jpg
This legal document, page 16 of a filing from October 29, 2021, argues that the proposed expert testimony and 'grooming opinions' of an individual named Roccio should be deemed inadmissible. The author contends that Roccio's testimony is substantially more prejudicial than probative under Rule 403, fails to meet the Daubert standard for scientific reliability, and oversimplifies complex issues, thereby risking misleading the jury. The argument is supported by citations from several court cases, including United States v. Burns and Gonyer, which criticize similar 'grooming theories'.
DOJ-OGR-00005559.jpg
This legal document is a page from a government motion arguing against publicizing the full names of four minor victims in an upcoming criminal trial. The government contends that the defense has not shown a specific need for this disclosure, and that the court should prioritize the victims' privacy and dignity. The motion cites several legal precedents that support protecting witnesses' identities, especially when safety and privacy are concerns.
DOJ-OGR-00005399.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal filing from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 29, 2021. It discusses legal standards and Second Circuit precedents regarding the protection of witness identities versus a defendant's right to cross-examination. The text cites various cases (Marcus, Marti, Urena, Cavallaro) to support the argument that courts must balance witness safety against the defense's need for information, particularly in cases involving sex trafficking or safety risks.
DOJ-OGR-00011533.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding, dated July 22, 2022, in which a judge is ruling on objections made by the defendant. The judge overrules objections to including testimony from a victim named Carolyn about a sexual assault by Epstein and information about perjury charges in a presentence report. The judge affirms the court's broad discretion in considering such information for sentencing and states a belief in the reliability of both Carolyn's testimony and the information underlying the perjury charges.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015260.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a larger report (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT) containing an excerpt of a narrative or book. The text features a bizarre account involving 'Bennett' (identified as Bill Bennett) speaking to 'Cathy' about lizard-like aliens, trans-dimensional planes, and mind control. The document includes meta-commentary analyzing Cathy's skepticism and quoting a maxim attributed to Bill Bennett.
Aliens and Dimensions
Bennett claims they are in an alien dimension and he is projecting thoughts into her mind.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity