DOJ-OGR-00000067.tif

41 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court document / legal ruling
File Size: 41 KB
Summary

This document is a legal ruling affirming the District Court's June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction against Ghislaine Maxwell. It states that Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement did not bar Maxwell's prosecution, her indictment complied with the statute of limitations, and her sentence was procedurally reasonable. The background details Maxwell's role in coordinating and facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of women and underage girls from 1994 until approximately 2004 across various U.S. locations.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey Epstein Perpetrator of sexual abuse
Epstein's NPA did not bar Maxwell's prosecution; recipient of sexual abuse facilitated by Maxwell.
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant, facilitator of sexual abuse
Prosecuted by USAO-SDNY; Indictment complied with statute of limitations; Rule 33 motion denied; sentence found proce...

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
USAO-SDNY
Prosecuted Maxwell; not bound by Epstein's NPA.
District Court
Denied Maxwell's Rule 33 motion; response to jury note did not result in amendment or prejudicial variance; issued ju...
Government
The party to whom facts are described in the light most favorable during appeal.

Timeline (3 events)

1994
Ghislaine Maxwell began grooming young women for sexual activity with Jeffrey Epstein.
2004 (approximate)
The pattern of sexual abuse facilitated by Maxwell for Epstein continued until this time.
various locations in the United States
2022-06-29
District Court's judgment of conviction for Ghislaine Maxwell was affirmed.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Locations where Maxwell provided Epstein access to underage girls.

Relationships (1)

Ghislaine Maxwell facilitator/perpetrator Jeffrey Epstein
Maxwell coordinated, facilitated, and contributed to Epstein's sexual abuse; groomed young women for Epstein.

Key Quotes (3)

"We hold that Epstein's NPA did not bar Maxwell's prosecution by USAO-SDNY as the NPA does not bind USAO-SDNY."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000067.tif
Quote #1
"We hold that Maxwell's Indictment complied with the statute of limitations as 18 U.S.C. § 3283 extended the time to bring charges of sexual abuse for offenses committed before the date of the statute's enactment."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000067.tif
Quote #2
"Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell coordinated, facilitated, and contributed to Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of women and underage girls."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000067.tif
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document