DOJ-OGR-00009256.jpg
1000 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
1000 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the examination of a witness named Conrad. The questioning focuses on whether Conrad intentionally lied by omitting the fact he was a lawyer in order to be selected for a jury. Conrad admits to omitting the "pertinent fact" and the questioning explores his motivations, his state of mind during deliberations, and his interactions with U.S. Marshals who later served him a subpoena related to the matter.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| PAUL M. DAUGERDAS | Named party in case |
Mentioned in the case title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.
|
| Conrad | Witness |
The person being questioned throughout the transcript.
|
| Juror No. 2 | Juror / Forewoman |
Mentioned by Conrad as the forewoman to whom he handed a note about respondeat superior.
|
| Mr. Shanbrom | Witness |
Mentioned as having been on the witness stand during the trial.
|
| Lynn Swann |
Mentioned as someone the witness (Conrad) expressed admiration for during voir dire.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | government agency |
The plaintiff in the case title.
|
| THE COURT | government agency |
Referenced throughout as the judicial body presiding over the case, asking questions, and being the entity lied to.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, indicating they are the court reporters who transcribed the proceedings.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location of Conrad's house where marshals served him an order.
|
|
|
Mentioned by Conrad as his place of residence.
|
Relationships (2)
The document details an investigation by the Court into Conrad's conduct as a juror, specifically whether he lied to the Court to get on the jury.
Conrad identifies Juror No. 2 as the forewoman and states he handed her a note during deliberations, indicating they served on the same jury.
Key Quotes (5)
"When you were deliberating in this case, did you have it present in your mind that you had lied to get on to this jury?"Source
— Questioner (Q)
(Asking Conrad about his state of mind during jury deliberations.)
DOJ-OGR-00009256.jpg
Quote #1
"Do you believe that you lied to the Court about being a lawyer?"Source
— Questioner (Q)
(Directly questioning Conrad about his omission during jury selection.)
DOJ-OGR-00009256.jpg
Quote #2
"I know I omitted that very pertinent fact."Source
— Conrad (A)
(Conrad's response when asked if he lied to the court about being a lawyer.)
DOJ-OGR-00009256.jpg
Quote #3
"Do you recall telling them that in your view you had not lied, because no one asked you about whether or not you were a lawyer?"Source
— Questioner (Q)
(Questioning Conrad about what he told the marshals who served him a subpoena.)
DOJ-OGR-00009256.jpg
Quote #4
"Is there anything you think it would be important for us to know about you in making a decision as to whether you should serve as a juror in this case?"Source
— The Court
(A question from the judge during voir dire, quoted by the questioner to Conrad.)
DOJ-OGR-00009256.jpg
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document