Juror No. 2
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Conrad
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Jury deliberation | Conrad participated in jury deliberations for the case. | Jury room | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009256.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the examination of a witness named Conrad. The questioning focuses on whether Conrad intentionally lied by omitting the fact he was a lawyer in order to be selected for a jury. Conrad admits to omitting the "pertinent fact" and the questioning explores his motivations, his state of mind during deliberations, and his interactions with U.S. Marshals who later served him a subpoena related to the matter.
DOJ-OGR-00017359.jpg
This document is page 10 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It records the reading of the verdict, declaring 'Not guilty' on Count Two and 'Guilty' on Counts Three, Four, Five, and Six. The remainder of the page documents the Court polling individual jurors (Nos. 26, 48, 49, 37, 50, 70, 124, 29, 89, and 2) to confirm that this is indeed their verdict.
DOJ-OGR-00014743.jpg
This document is page 10 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It records the reading of the verdict, where the defendant is found 'Not guilty' on Count Two and 'Guilty' on Counts Three through Six. Following the reading, the court polls individual jurors (identified by number) to confirm that this is indeed their verdict.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity