DOJ-OGR-00009192.jpg

552 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
0
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 552 KB
Summary

This document is the table of contents for a legal motion filed on February 24, 2022, on behalf of Ms. Maxwell. The motion argues for a new trial, primarily on the grounds that Juror No. 50 provided deliberately false answers during the jury selection process (voir dire). The document outlines the legal arguments, challenges the government's position, and discusses the procedures for a potential hearing on the matter.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Ms. Maxwell Defendant (implied)
Mentioned throughout the table of contents as the party entitled to a new trial and discovery.
Juror No. 50 Juror
Mentioned as having provided allegedly false answers during voir dire, which is the basis for the motion for a new tr...

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
government Government agency
Mentioned as an opposing party in the legal matter, with policy concerns and an attempt to manufacture a 'Show Hearing'.
Court Judicial body
Referenced in the argument that it should reject the government's attempt to manufacture a 'Show Hearing'.

Timeline (3 events)

A motion for a new trial for Ms. Maxwell, based on issues with a juror's answers during voir dire.
Juror No. 50 provided answers to questions during the voir dire process, which are now being challenged as deliberately false.
A potential 'Show Hearing' is mentioned, which the filing argues the Court should reject and outlines how any questioning should be conducted.
Court government lawyers

Relationships (2)

Ms. Maxwell Adversarial (Legal) government
The document is a table of contents for a legal motion where Ms. Maxwell is arguing against the government's position regarding her trial.
Ms. Maxwell Legal (Defendant-Juror) Juror No. 50
The motion argues that Ms. Maxwell's right to a fair trial was compromised by Juror No. 50's allegedly false answers during jury selection.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document