DOJ-OGR-00009950.jpg
1020 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
1020 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the cross-examination of a juror, Ms. Conrad. Attorney Mr. Shechtman questions her about why she made several omissions during jury selection, including failing to disclose her husband's criminal history. The questioning explores her motivations, such as a $40/day juror stipend, unemployment, and an intellectual curiosity for the courtroom, and challenges her distinction between an "omission" and a "lie".
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Conrad | Witness / Juror |
The individual being cross-examined about omissions made during voir dire.
|
| MR. SHECHTMAN | Attorney |
The attorney conducting the cross-examination of Ms. Conrad.
|
| MR. GAIR | Attorney |
An attorney who states "Nothing further, Your Honor" on page 229.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the legal proceedings, referred to as "Your Honor".
|
| Mr. Okula | Attorney |
An attorney who previously questioned Ms. Conrad about her motivations for being on the jury.
|
| PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL. | Defendant |
Named as the defendant in the case UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.
|
| Grace | Relative of witness |
The name of Ms. Conrad's elderly maternal aunt whom she takes care of.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | government agency |
The plaintiff in the case against Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS | company |
The court reporting service that transcribed the document.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2012-02-15
Cross-examination of witness Ms. Conrad by attorney Mr. Shechtman regarding her statements and omissions during the jury selection process (voir dire).
Courtroom
The jury selection process where Ms. Conrad was questioned and made omissions about her husband's criminal history, her travel habits, and her care for an elderly aunt.
Courtroom
Ms. Conrad
Attorneys
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
A location Ms. Conrad stated she and her husband travel to.
|
Relationships (3)
Ms. Conrad refers to her husband and their travel. The transcript reveals he has a criminal history which she omitted during voir dire.
Mr. Shechtman is an attorney conducting an adversarial cross-examination of Ms. Conrad, who is a witness.
Ms. Conrad identifies Grace as her maternal aunt whom she takes care of once or twice a week.
Key Quotes (3)
"I have been using the word "omission," that's correct."Source
— Ms. Conrad
(In response to Mr. Shechtman's question about her reluctance to use the word "lie".)
DOJ-OGR-00009950.jpg
Quote #1
"It's already been destroyed, sir. It was destroyed December 18, 2007, when I got suspended."Source
— Ms. Conrad
(Explaining why the risk to her legal career was not a deterrent to perjury, as it was already damaged.)
DOJ-OGR-00009950.jpg
Quote #2
"No. It's the intellectual stimulation, sir, beyond the dollars and cents, the $40 and change or whatever, and keeping busy. And I hadn't been in a courtroom, and I enjoy and like the dynamics of it."Source
— Ms. Conrad
(Explaining her motivations for wanting to be on the jury, aside from the $40/day stipend.)
DOJ-OGR-00009950.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document