DOJ-OGR-00003029.jpg

724 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 724 KB
Summary

This legal document page, filed on April 16, 2021, describes court proceedings from March 2019. Following the death of Judge Sweet, Chief Judge McMahon took over the case and held a hearing on March 26, 2019, to question the Government about its application and why the law firm Boies Schiller had not sought to be relieved from a protective order.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Chief Judge McMahon Chief Judge
Presided over hearings regarding the Government's application after Judge Sweet's death.
Judge Sweet Judge
Passed away in March 2019 before ruling on the Government's application.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Boies Schiller company
A party in the case that did not make an application to be relieved from a protective order.
The Government government agency
A party in the litigation that submitted an application and arguments to the court.

Timeline (2 events)

2019-03
Judge Sweet passed away before ruling on the Government's application.
2019-03-26
Chief Judge McMahon held the first of two ex parte and sealed hearings to inquire about the Government's application and why Boies Schiller had not sought relief from a protective order.

Relationships (1)

Chief Judge McMahon professional Judge Sweet
Chief Judge McMahon took over the Government's application in the case after Judge Sweet's death.

Key Quotes (4)

"specific knowledge of the subject matter of discovery materials is relatively limited, due to the confidential nature"
Source
— The Government (From the Government's letters, explaining its limited knowledge of discovery materials.)
DOJ-OGR-00003029.jpg
Quote #1
"any presumption against modification of a protective order is unreasonable where, as here, the protective order is on its face temporary or limited."
Source
— The Government (The Government's argument that the Martindell balancing test should not apply.)
DOJ-OGR-00003029.jpg
Quote #2
"speak to why Boies Schiller in particular didn’t make their own application."
Source
— The Government (The Government's reply to Chief Judge McMahon's inquiry during the March 26, 2019 hearing.)
DOJ-OGR-00003029.jpg
Quote #3
"simply isn’t in a position to be able to describe the investigation in the way that we have in our submission."
Source
— The Government (The Government's explanation for Boies Schiller's situation.)
DOJ-OGR-00003029.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document