DOJ-OGR-00019138.jpg
619 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
619 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural debate between legal counsel and a judge. An unnamed attorney objects to Ms. Moe's proposal to have a witness, Mr. Buscemi, present exhibits to the jury, arguing it prevents substantive cross-examination and resembles a closing argument. Ms. Moe defends the method as a streamlined process to show the jury evidence they haven't yet seen.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Honor | Judge |
Addressed by the speakers as 'Honor' and 'Your Honor', presiding over the legal proceeding.
|
| Mr. Buscemi | Witness |
Mentioned as a witness whose testimony would be limited to identifying exhibits, without the possibility of substanti...
|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript who is proposing a method of presenting evidence with a witness to the jury.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the document as the court reporting service.
|
| the Court | Government agency |
Mentioned by Ms. Moe in acknowledging the judge's concerns ('I understand the Court's concerns').
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A procedural argument in court regarding the method of presenting evidence to a jury. An unnamed speaker objects to a proposed method of showing exhibits with a witness, Mr. Buscemi, arguing it's akin to a closing argument and prevents proper cross-examination. Ms. Moe defends the proposal as a streamlined way to present evidence the jury has not yet seen.
Courtroom (implied)
Relationships (2)
Ms. Moe, likely an attorney, addresses the 'Honor' (judge) directly to argue a point of legal procedure during a hearing.
An unnamed speaker, likely an attorney, addresses the 'Honor' (judge) to make an objection and argue a point of legal procedure.
Key Quotes (2)
"This witness, Mr. -- if I'm saying it correctly, Mr. Buscemi, can't be cross-examined substantively about anything; all he's going to be able to say would be, I looked at this, and I looked at that, and I looked at this, I looked at that, and those are the exhibits."Source
— Unnamed Speaker
(Explaining the limitations of Mr. Buscemi's potential testimony as a basis for objecting to the proposed method of presenting evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00019138.jpg
Quote #1
"Your Honor, that's why we propose doing this with a witness, to avoid any, sort of, awkwardness. But I don't understand the objection to publishing items that are in evidence that the jury has not yet seen."Source
— MS. MOE
(Defending the proposed method of presenting evidence to the jury through a witness.)
DOJ-OGR-00019138.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document