HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013372.jpg
1.54 MB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal brief / memorandum of law (motion for summary judgment)
File Size:
1.54 MB
Summary
This document is page 3 of a legal filing (likely a Motion for Summary Judgment) arguing that Jeffrey Epstein's lawsuit against attorney Bradley J. Edwards should be dismissed. The text argues that Epstein cannot sue Edwards while simultaneously asserting his Fifth Amendment privilege ('sword and shield' doctrine) to avoid answering questions about sexual abuse. It also notes that Epstein recently settled three cases handled by Edwards for amounts significantly higher than the 'minimal value' Epstein claimed they were worth.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Plaintiff/Litigant |
Asserted Fifth Amendment privilege regarding sexual abuse; sued Edwards; settled three cases handled by Edwards.
|
| Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. | Attorney/Defendant |
Attorney representing victims; being sued by Epstein; filing for summary judgment to dismiss Epstein's claims.
|
| Minors/Victims | Victims |
Referenced in relation to 'sexual abuse of his many victims' and clients represented by Edwards.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Indicated by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013372'.
|
Timeline (2 events)
During Discovery
Epstein asserted Fifth Amendment privilege regarding sexual abuse questions.
Legal Discovery Process
During pending claims against Edwards
Relationships (2)
Epstein filed suit against Edwards; Edwards is seeking summary judgment against Epstein.
Bradley J. Edwards
→
Legal Representation
→
Victims/Clients
Reference to 'cases Edwards handled' and 'recover for his clients'.
Key Quotes (4)
"Epstein has asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege rather than answer questions about the extent of the sexual abuse of his many victims."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013372.jpg
Quote #1
"the cases did not settle for the “minimal value” that Epstein suggested in his Complaint."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013372.jpg
Quote #2
"Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., is entitled to summary judgment on Epstein’s frivolous claim..."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013372.jpg
Quote #3
"Epstein cannot seek damages from Edwards while at the same time asserting a Fifth Amendment privilege to block relevant discovery."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013372.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document