Bradley J. Edwards
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
23
Very Strong
|
29 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Client |
17
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
L.M.
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Alan M. Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
E.W.
|
Client |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jessica Cadwell
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Jacquie Johnson
|
Business associate |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
PAUL G. CASSELL
|
Co authors |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jessica Cadwell
|
Business associate |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Tony Figueroa
|
Deponent examiner |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Henderson
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Nathanael J. Mitchell
|
Co authors |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jacquie Johnson
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN
|
Employee |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Does
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
E.W., L.M., Jane Doe
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Witness evidence source |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Paul G. Cassell
|
Co plaintiffs |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Epstein voluntarily dismissed all claims brought by him against Bradley J. Edwards. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Civil action against Epstein represented by Edwards. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Bradley J. Edwards provided notice of intent to depose Donald Trump. | Legal proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Publication of legal article regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act. | Northwestern University Sch... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of Fourth Amended Counterclaim | Palm Beach County Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein filed a Second Amended Complaint against Bradley Edwards. | Palm Beach County, Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Motion for Summary Judgment | Court (likely Florida) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Publication of legal article regarding Crime Victims' Rights Act | Journal of Criminal Law & C... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual assault cases against Epstein | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein voluntarily dismissed his claims against Edwards on the eve of a summary judgment hearing. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of a motion for joinder in the CVRA action on behalf of Jane Doe 3 and 4. | Unknown | View |
| 2022-06-26 | N/A | Filing of Document 681-1 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | US Court System | View |
| 2020-11-02 | N/A | Stipulation signed by attorneys for both parties | N/A | View |
| 2020-02-11 | N/A | Case management conference | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-01-28 | N/A | Filing of Joint Stipulation and Order on Plaintiff's Anonymity | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-12-27 | N/A | Filing of Proposed Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Bradley J. Edwards. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-12-09 | N/A | Filing of this letter notifying the court of Plaintiff's intent to stand on the current complaint. | Court | View |
| 2019-12-09 | N/A | Plaintiff notified Court she would not file amended pleading | New York | View |
| 2019-10-16 | N/A | Filing of Document 24 in case 1:19-cv-07625 | New York, NY | View |
| 2017-06-09 | N/A | Supreme Court of Florida order denying discretionary review in Epstein v. Edwards. | Florida Supreme Court | View |
| 2017-05-30 | N/A | Deadline for Respondent to serve a reply | Supreme Court of Florida | View |
| 2017-03-20 | N/A | Filing of Defendant's Sur-Reply to Supplemental Reply | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2017-03-16 | N/A | Original scheduled date for hearing on Edwards Subpoena | New York, NY | View |
| 2016-12-22 | N/A | Order transferring Motion to Quash Subpoena to Southern District of New York (Giuffre v. Maxwell) | Southern District of Florid... | View |
| 2016-07-07 | N/A | Filing of Motion to Seal Bradley J. Edwards' Motion to Quash Subpoena. | Southern District of Florida | View |
076.pdf
This document is a Joint Stipulation for Dismissal filed on December 8, 2020, in the U.S. District Court (SDNY). The plaintiff 'VE' and the defendants (Epstein's estate executors Indyke and Kahn, along with associated entities) agreed to dismiss the case with prejudice because the plaintiff resolved her claims through the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. The order was signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
051.pdf
This document is a letter dated January 10, 2020, from attorney Bradley J. Edwards to Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman regarding five specific cases involving 'Doe' plaintiffs against Darren K. Indyke and other Epstein-related entities. Edwards informs the court that while discussions with the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program are productive, his clients do not wish to stay their lawsuits. The letter also outlines an agreed-upon discovery schedule with the Estate's counsel, Mr. Moskowitz.
045.pdf
This document is a Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law opposing a Motion to Dismiss in the case of VE v. Indyke et al. The plaintiff, a victim of Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse beginning in 2001 at age 16, argues that the corporate defendants (Nine East 71st Street Corp, Financial Trust Company, and NES LLC) are liable for negligence, negligent security, and negligent supervision. The memorandum asserts these entities were integral to Epstein's sex trafficking enterprise, with employees facilitating the recruitment and scheduling of victims, and argues that claims are valid under the New York Child Victims Act.
044.pdf
This document is a letter from Bradley J. Edwards (Edwards Pottinger LLC), attorney for Plaintiff VE, to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street (1:19-cv-07625). The letter requests an extension of time to file an Opposition to the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, moving the deadline from December 13, 2019, to December 18, 2019. The document includes Judge Nathan's handwritten 'SO ORDERED' endorsement dated December 18, 2019.
043.pdf
This document is a letter from attorney Bradley J. Edwards to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated December 13, 2019, regarding the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al. Edwards requests a five-day extension (until December 18, 2019) to file the Plaintiff's Opposition to the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. The letter notes that the Defendants have been conferred with and have no objection to the extension.
041.pdf
This document is a letter filed on December 9, 2019, by attorney Bradley J. Edwards to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street (1:19-cv-07625). The letter informs the court that the Plaintiff (VE) will not file an amended pleading in response to the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss filed in November 2019, but will instead defend the existing First Amended Complaint. The document establishes the legal representation of the plaintiff by Edwards Pottinger LLC in this civil action against an Epstein-related entity.
028.pdf
This document is a letter from attorney Bradley J. Edwards to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al., dated November 12, 2019. Edwards opposes the Defendants' request for a two-week extension to respond to the complaint, arguing that they have already been granted a 45-day extension and that the upcoming Rule 26(f) conference should proceed. The letter notes that the Defendants' delay is related to a filing in the U.S. Virgin Islands regarding a 'claims resolution program' for the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, which the Plaintiff argues should not halt the current litigation.
024.pdf
This document is a legal letter filed on October 16, 2019, by attorney Bradley J. Edwards to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It concerns the case 'VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al.' and serves to alert the court to a recent decision in a related Epstein case (Katlyn Doe v. Indyke) where Judge Castel allowed a plaintiff to proceed anonymously, supporting Edwards' client's similar motion.
004.pdf
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on August 20, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:19-cv-07625-AJN). The plaintiff, identified only as 'VE', is requesting permission to proceed anonymously in a lawsuit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. The defendants include Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as representatives of the estate, as well as Nine East 71st Street Corporation, Financial Trust Company, Inc., and NES, LLC.
068.pdf
This document is a Mandate from the Fourth District Court of Appeal of Florida, dated September 18, 2009, regarding the case of Jeffrey Epstein v. State of Florida. The mandate follows an opinion issued on September 2, 2009, where the court affirmed the lower court's decision, treating Epstein's petition for writ of certiorari as a full appeal. The document lists numerous attorneys involved, including R. Alexander Acosta on the distribution list, and identifies Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. as an appellee alongside the State and a redacted party.
061.pdf
This document is a Supplemental Appendix filed by Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. in a Florida state court case involving Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a transcript of a June 2009 hearing regarding the unsealing of court records, administrative orders, case law, and federal court filings including a declaration by AUSA A. Marie Villafana regarding the federal Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The appendix documents the legal arguments surrounding the transparency of the Epstein proceedings and the government's interaction with victims under the Crime Victims' Rights Act.
060.pdf
This document is a response filed by Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. (The Palm Beach Post) to an emergency petition for writ of certiorari by Jeffrey Epstein. The Post argues that the trial court correctly unsealed a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and its addendum related to Epstein's solicitation of minors, asserting that the documents were improperly sealed in the first instance and that no valid legal basis exists for their continued closure.
053.pdf
This document is a court order from June 26, 2009, issued by Judge Jeffrey J. Colbath in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida. The order denies Jeffrey Epstein's motion to stay the disclosure of his Non-Prosecution Agreement and sets a deadline of July 2, 2009, for the Clerk to release the documents, allowing time for an appeal to the 4th DCA. The document includes a service list of attorneys involved, including U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta and defense attorneys like Jack Goldberger.
047.pdf
Legal motion filed on June 25, 2009, by Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Critton, Pike, Goldberger) in Palm Beach County Circuit Court. Epstein requests a stay on the disclosure of his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) pending an appellate review, arguing that unsealing the document would cause irreparable harm to privacy rights and innocent third parties. The motion opposes efforts by the Palm Beach Post and a redacted non-party to unseal these court records.
041.pdf
This document is a 'Motion to Make Court Records Confidential' filed by Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys on June 11, 2009, in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County. The defense seeks to maintain the seal on the Non-Prosecution Agreement (filed July 2008) and its Addendum, citing threats to the administration of justice and privacy rights of third parties. The motion references interventions by the Palm Beach Post and a non-party identified as 'EW' (whose name is redacted in one section) seeking access to these records.
035.pdf
This document is a motion filed on June 2, 2009, by The Palm Beach Post seeking to intervene in the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein to unseal a non-prosecution agreement and its addendum. The Post argues that the sealing was improper, lacked necessary legal findings, and that the documents are of significant public interest given the accusations of soliciting minors. The document cites numerous civil lawsuits against Epstein and criticizes the secrecy surrounding his plea deal.
034.pdf
This document is a motion filed on June 3, 2009, by a redacted nonparty (a victim of Jeffrey Epstein) seeking to unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and its addendum in the Florida state criminal case. The motion argues the sealing violated Florida judicial rules and public policy, and that the documents are material to the victim's pending civil suit. Exhibits include judgments of conviction against Epstein for solicitation and procuring a minor, sealing orders from 2008, and transcripts from the June 30, 2008 plea conference where the existence of the federal NPA was discussed in open court.
029.pdf
A Notice of Hearing filed in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County regarding the case State of Florida vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 2008-CF9381 AXX). The hearing, scheduled for May 29, 2009, before Judge Jeffrey J. Colbath, concerns a motion by a redacted non-party (represented by Bradley J. Edwards for client 'E.W.') to vacate an order sealing records and to unseal said records. The file path in the footer references 'Wild v. Epstein', suggesting the redacted party may be named Wild.
027.pdf
Legal stipulation filed on December 13, 2010, in the Southern District of Florida, dismissing the case of M.J. vs. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen with prejudice. The document confirms a settlement was reached, with the court retaining jurisdiction to enforce its terms, and states that each party will bear their own attorney's fees.
025.pdf
This document is an unopposed motion filed on November 29, 2010, by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team requesting a 10-day extension to respond to two plaintiff motions regarding protective orders and evidence preservation. The motion states that the parties are currently in discussions to resolve the matters and that plaintiff's counsel, Gary Farmer, does not oppose the extension. The document lists M.J. as the plaintiff and Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen as defendants.
022.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on November 23, 2010, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case 9:10-CV-81111-WPD). Attorney Bradley J. Edwards requests the court to admit Paul G. Cassell (a member of the Utah Bar) to appear pro hac vice as co-counsel for the plaintiff, identified as M.J., in a civil suit against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The document documents the payment of a $75 admission fee and lists the defense counsel for Jeffrey Epstein from the firm Fowler White Burnett PA.
017-19.pdf
Plaintiff Jane Doe filed an emergency motion to hold Jeffrey Epstein in contempt for failing to comply with discovery orders in a civil case (08-CV-80893). The motion alleges that Epstein failed to produce state criminal discovery materials and provided only heavily redacted correspondence with the U.S. Attorney's Office, obscuring the defense counsel's side of the communications. Doe seeks immediate production of unredacted documents, sanctions of $5,000 against Epstein's counsel, and a ruling that withheld materials be deemed admissible at trial.
017-13.pdf
This document is a protective response filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe on May 27, 2010, in the Southern District of Florida case against Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff requests the court to promptly order the production of tax returns and other documents that Epstein has withheld on Fifth Amendment grounds, emphasizing that the trial date is set for July 19, 2010. The filing notes that negotiations with Epstein's counsel failed and lists numerous related cases and attorneys involved.
017-01.pdf
This document is a Motion to Compel Answers to Plaintiff's First Request for Production filed by Jane Doe in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida against Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff argues that Epstein's blanket invocation of Fifth Amendment privileges to refuse producing documents (such as phone records, tax returns, and correspondence) is improper and that he should be compelled to answer or provide a privilege log. The motion details specific discovery requests and Epstein's uniform response asserting his constitutional rights against self-incrimination.
016.pdf
This document is a Motion for a Protective Order filed by plaintiff M.J. on November 11, 2010, requesting the court bar Jeffrey Epstein from direct or indirect contact. The motion details a pattern of Epstein using private investigators to harass and intimidate victims and witnesses, specifically citing an incident on July 1, 2010, where a PI named Thaddeus Knowles followed 'Jane Doe' and flashed lights into her home. It also references Epstein's intimidation of other witnesses including Sarah Kellen, Leslie Groff, and Alfredo Rodriguez, and his history of violating no-contact orders.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-06-13 | Paid | Bradley J. Edwards | Court | $46.00 | Filing fee for Petition/Motion (Complaint) RE: ... | View |
| 2016-05-27 | Received | EST | Bradley J. Edwards | $45.00 | Check #31834, Memo: Menninger. Likely a witness... | View |
Epstein Case
Epstein alleges Edwards had contacts with media to publicize cases.
Responses to solicitation
Responses received by Edwards from the solicitation letters.
Request for evidence/information
Request for collected info regarding sexual abuse of clients. Request was declined.
No Subject
Email address listed as Brad@pathtojustice.com
No Subject
Email address listed as Brad@pathtojustice.com
Witness solicitation / Investigation
Maxwell alleges these are 'witness solicitation letters' containing a 'skewed version of allegations'. Edwards argues they are protected work product.
Solicitation for assistance
Form solicitation letters requesting assistance as a witness in the case, allegedly attempting to 'guilt' witnesses.
Case Status Update and Discovery Schedule
Letter informing the court that plaintiffs do not wish to stay their cases despite the Compensation Program and outlining an agreed discovery schedule.
VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al., 1:19-cv-07625 (AJN)
Request for extension of time to file Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss until December 18, 2019.
VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al., 1:19-cv-07625 (AJN)
Request for extension of time to file Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.
Re: VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al., 1:19-cv-07625 (AJN)
Notification that Plaintiff VE does not intend to file an amended pleading and will defend her current First Amended Complaint against the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.
VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al., 1:19-cv-07625 (AJN)
Opposition to Defendants' request for extension of time to respond to complaint.
VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al., 1:19-cv-07625 (AJN)
Notice of supplemental authority bringing a decision by Judge Castel in a related Epstein case to the court's attention regarding proceeding anonymously.
Subpoena to Produce Documents
Legal command to produce documents related to Virginia Giuffre, previous litigation, and media communications.
Service of court documents
Service of foregoing document
Stipulation of Dismissal
Filing of stipulation of dismissal with prejudice via CM/ECF.
Motion for Limited Appearance
Request to admit Paul G. Cassell as co-counsel
Certificate of Service
Service of motion via US Mail or other authorized manner
Notice of Striking Certificate of Service
Filing of document striking previous certificates DE 5 and DE 6
Service of Process
Edwards advised Knight that Plaintiff M.J. had service on Mr. Epstein at his building in New York.
Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Modification of Order
Request to modify settlement conference rules to prevent contact between Doe and Epstein.
Plaintiff Jane Doe's Protective Response
Filing of protective response and service to parties via CM/ECF
Deposition Testimony
Edwards testified regarding his lack of knowledge of the scheme and lack of discussion regarding Epstein cases with Rothstein.
Certificate of Service (L.M. case)
Service of documents via US Mail and Facsimile
Jane Doe
Requests that Jane Doe sign a HIPAA release to obtain her records from the DJJ for her time at the Milton Center. Also asks for a one-week extension on 'Responses to Net Wirth ROGS'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity