DOJ-OGR-00016735.jpg
577 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
4
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
577 KB
Summary
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a discussion between a judge and several lawyers regarding procedural issues. The topics include a defense subpoena, ongoing negotiations with the government over redactions for exhibits, and a decision by the defense not to pursue testimony from a Mr. Hamilton in England due to technical complications.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the legal proceeding, addressing counsel about requests and procedural matters.
|
| MS. MENNINGER | Counsel/Lawyer |
Addressing the court, stating she has conferred with the government regarding redactions on exhibits.
|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Counsel/Lawyer |
Addressing the court, confirming that they have been discussing redactions and will finalize them soon.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Counsel/Lawyer |
Addressing the court to report technical issues preventing testimony from Mr. Hamilton in England.
|
| Mr. Hamilton | Potential Witness |
Mentioned as an individual in England whose testimony could not be provided due to technical complications.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Government agency |
The judicial body presiding over the case, addressed by the lawyers.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding, listed at the bottom of the document.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion in court regarding a defense subpoena, negotiations with the government over redactions, and the technical difficulties of obtaining testimony from a witness (Mr. Hamilton) located in England.
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location of Mr. Hamilton, from where providing testimony was deemed too complicated.
|
Relationships (4)
Ms. Menninger, as counsel, addresses the judge ('Your Honor') to provide an update on case matters.
Mr. Rohrbach, as counsel, addresses the judge ('your Honor') to provide an update on redactions.
Ms. Sternheim, as counsel, addresses the judge to inform the court about a decision regarding a witness.
Counsel (Menninger, Rohrbach, Sternheim)
→
Adversarial / Professional
→
the government
The lawyers are conferring and 'trading views' with the government on procedural matters like redactions, indicating a professional but adversarial legal relationship.
Key Quotes (2)
"All I have is a letter from the lawyers saying that they have a defense subpoena and their witness would invoke."Source
— THE COURT
(Explaining the limited information provided by counsel regarding their request for a witness.)
DOJ-OGR-00016735.jpg
Quote #1
"There were technical issues with regard to providing testimony from Mr. Hamilton in England, and we viewed it to be just far too complicated."Source
— MS. STERNHEIM
(Informing the court why they will not be proceeding with obtaining testimony from Mr. Hamilton.)
DOJ-OGR-00016735.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document