England
LocationRelationship Network
EFTA00037063.pdf
A screenshot of a Daily Mail article, marked as evidence with Bates stamp EFTA00037063. The article features a personal account—likely from the woman pictured in a bikini with her face redacted—discussing the experience of being named in Epstein-related document releases. The text references Epstein ('dead pedophile billionaire'), Ghislaine Maxwell ('female accomplice'), and Prince Andrew ('disgraced Prince of England').
EFTA00029540.pdf
This document is an Opinion & Order by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court denies Maxwell's motions to dismiss the indictment based on Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, statute of limitations arguments, and pre-indictment delay. However, the Court grants Maxwell's motion to sever the perjury charges from the sex trafficking-related charges, ruling they must be tried separately to ensure a fair trial. The Court also orders the parties to negotiate a schedule for outstanding pretrial disclosures.
EFTA00022206.pdf
This document is a chapter from a legal textbook or guidance manual titled 'Chapter A7: Mutual Legal Assistance in Cases of Fraud,' released on July 13, 2019. It details the legal framework, international conventions, and statutory powers (such as CICA 2003 and POCA 2002) governing how the UK provides and requests assistance in cross-border fraud investigations, including freezing assets and gathering evidence. The document contains no specific information regarding Jeffrey Epstein, flight logs, or specific criminal events, but rather outlines the laws that would be applicable to such international investigations.
EFTA00020261.pdf
This document is an Opinion & Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court denied Maxwell's motions to dismiss the indictment based on Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, statute of limitations, and pre-indictment delay. However, the Court granted Maxwell's motion to sever the perjury charges, ruling they will be tried separately from the sex trafficking-related counts to ensure a fair trial.
EFTA00014592.pdf
An email from a redacted sender (likely a pilates/dance trainer) to Ghislaine Maxwell dated February 7, 2004. The sender expresses interest in continuing to train 'Jeffery' (Epstein) and explicitly discusses his preference for 'beautiful, talented young women.' The sender proposes a financial arrangement to actively scout and recruit 'suitable girls' from dance classes, asking for this to potentially become their main source of income.
EFTA00011192.pdf
This document is a legal opinion provided by David Perry QC regarding the extradition law of England and Wales in the context of Ghislaine Maxwell's bail proceedings in the United States. It outlines the extradition process between the UK and US, potential bars to extradition, human rights considerations, and the implications of Ms. Maxwell waiving her right to extradition. The document concludes that if Ms. Maxwell were to abscond to the UK, it is highly unlikely she would be granted bail or successfully resist extradition.
EFTA00008863.pdf
This document is a Grand Jury presentation exhibit from US v. Ghislaine Maxwell containing flight logs, a FedEx invoice, and phone message pads. The flight logs (Nov 2000 - Jan 2001) detail travel on Epstein's jet (N908JE) between locations including New York, Palm Beach, St. Thomas, Paris, and London, frequently listing Epstein (JE) and Maxwell (GM) as passengers alongside others like Tom Pritzker and Ricardo Legoretta. Message pads from 2003 include notes about individuals 'wanting to work'.
DOJ-OGR-00022250.tif
This document is a flight log for the aircraft N908JE (G-1159B) detailing flights from November to December 2000 and one flight in January 2013. It lists departure and arrival locations, flight numbers, and passengers including JE, Shelley Lewis, AP, GM, Ricardo Legoretta, ET, Kelly Spamm, Tom Pritzker, and Virginia, with David Retleges identified as the pilot. The log also notes repositioning and certification flights, along with specific locations and remarks.
DOJ-OGR-00022810.tif
This document is a page from a transcript where Ghislaine Maxwell discusses her relationship with the ex-wife of her ex-husband, describing it as sometimes friendly but with latent hostility, and perceiving the ex-wife as a 'frenemy'. Maxwell also states her belief, based on 'female intuition', that this unnamed ex-wife liked Mr. Epstein. Todd Blanche and Leah Saffian contribute brief questions and interjections.
DOJ-OGR-00022659.tif
This document is a transcript of a deposition or testimony involving Ghislaine Maxwell, Todd Blanche, and David Markus. Maxwell discusses her initial meeting with Jeffrey Epstein in 1991, stating it was not work-related and that they were 'just friends.' She also talks about her father's death in 1991, his background as a British intelligence officer during WWII, and Epstein's offer to help her afterward.
DOJ-OGR-00022658.tif
This document is a transcript from an interview or deposition involving Ghislaine Maxwell, Todd Blanche, and Spencer Horn. Maxwell discusses her first meeting with Mr. Epstein in 1991, her move to America in 1990, her work for her father including launching a newspaper and acquiring others, and a potential meeting with Donald Trump through her father. She also states her willingness to speak with the government about her case and Mr. Epstein, noting that no government officials had contacted her until her indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00022620.tif
This document is an index or keyword list with associated page numbers, likely from a larger legal or investigative report. It contains various words and names, including 'Epstein's' and 'Eva', along with references to locations like 'England' and 'European', indicating a potential connection to the Epstein case. The footer identifies the document as originating from 'MAGNA LEGAL SERVICES' and bears a 'DOJ-OGR' control number.
DOJ-OGR-00022419.tif
This document is a page from a transcript of an interview or testimony involving Ghislaine Maxwell and Todd Blanche. Ghislaine Maxwell discusses her role as a general manager of a challenging property with BLM land, her salary of $25,000 a year, and her thoughts about returning to England.
DOJ-OGR-00022404.tif
This document is a transcript of testimony or a deposition involving Ghislaine Maxwell, Todd Blanche, and David Markus. Ghislaine Maxwell recounts how her connection with Epstein began, stating she was looking for real estate for her father when Epstein asked for her help finding a new apartment. She also describes returning to New York in 1991 after her father's death in England, and how Epstein encouraged her to stay in America and continue helping him amidst family and business turmoil.
DOJ-OGR-00018375.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from a case filed on August 10, 2022. A witness named Kate provides testimony about her first meeting with a person named Maxwell at Maxwell's townhouse, describing her feelings of finding a special and meaningful new friendship. Kate recounts sharing personal details with Maxwell, including her difficult home life with an unwell mother and her plans to study law at Oxford University, which Maxwell had also attended.
DOJ-OGR-00008590.jpg
This document is a page from jury instructions (Instruction No. 36) in a federal criminal case, filed on December 18, 2021. It details the 'overt act' element required to prove a conspiracy charge, listing specific allegations from the indictment against conspirators Maxwell and Epstein. The alleged overt acts, occurring between 1994 and 2002, involve the sexual abuse and exploitation of underage victims identified as Jane, Annie, Kate, and Carolyn across multiple locations including New York, Florida, New Mexico, and London.
DOJ-OGR-00001926.jpg
This legal document discusses cases involving Khashoggi, Bodmer, Hanson, and Sabhnani. It mentions a defendant who is a citizen of England and France and has three passports, and the document discusses the defendant's international travel and financial means.
DOJ-OGR-00001622.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 13, 2020, argues that a defendant is a flight risk due to significant undisclosed financial assets. It details her access to millions of dollars in foreign bank accounts in Switzerland and England, including a trust account with over $4 million, and highlights several large transactions. The document also notes her recent arrest at a New Hampshire property purchased for over $1 million in cash, suggesting she has not been forthcoming about her wealth and has the means to flee.
DOJ-OGR-00001601.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a filing arguing for bail for Ms. Maxwell. The defense contends that the COVID-19 pandemic significantly mitigates her flight risk, citing a recent ruling in another case (U.S. v. El Mokadem) where a defendant was released for this reason. The filing also distinguishes Maxwell's case from Epstein's, arguing the government does not allege she poses a current danger to the community, and that her alleged offenses ended in 1997.
DOJ-OGR-00001053.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal transcript dated April 1, 2021, where an attorney argues about bail conditions for a defendant. The attorney references several legal precedents (Khashoggi, Bodmer, Hanson, Sabhnani) to assert that international ties and financial means should lead to stricter bail conditions, not a denial of bail. The current defendant is described as a citizen of England and France with three passports, who has traveled internationally and has financial means, and the attorney cites the Sabhnani case, which involved allegations of holding individuals in slavery, to support their argument regarding bail.
DOJ-OGR-00000996.jpg
This document is a page from a Government filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) arguing against bail for the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell). It highlights her significant flight risk due to access to millions of dollars in foreign accounts (Swiss and English banks), recent large financial transfers into a trust, and the cash purchase of a New Hampshire hideout property. The prosecution argues the proposed $5 million bond is insufficient given her wealth.
DOJ-OGR-00020785.jpg
This is page 26 of a court order filed on April 16, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The page covers two main points: the Court's decision to sever perjury counts to ensure a fair trial, and the denial (as premature) of Maxwell's motion to strike 'surplusage' regarding allegations involving 'Minor Victim-3' and activities that occurred in England.
DOJ-OGR-00015993.jpg
This document is a flight log for aircraft N908JE, a G-1159B, for the period of November 2000 to January 2001, signed by pilot David Rodgers. The log details numerous domestic and international flights with passengers including Jeffrey Epstein (JE), Ghislaine Maxwell (GM), Shelley Lewis, Ricardo Legoretta, Tom Pritzker, and a person identified as 'Virginia'. The flights documented travel across the United States, to the U.S. Virgin Islands, and to destinations in France and the United Kingdom, including a stop at Marham Air Force Base.
DOJ-OGR-00015212.jpg
This document is the first page of the Curriculum Vitae for Elizabeth F. Loftus, a Distinguished Professor at UC Irvine. It outlines her education, teaching experience, and honorary degrees. The document is stamped as a Defendant's Exhibit (EL-1) for the case 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), which corresponds to the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, indicating Loftus was utilized as an expert witness for the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00002227(1).jpg
This Addendum Opinion, filed on December 23, 2020, addresses matters of English extradition law concerning Ghislaine Maxwell. It reaffirms that it is highly unlikely Maxwell could successfully resist extradition to the United States for charges in a July 2020 indictment, and that bail would likely be refused if she had absconded from prior proceedings. The document also notes that Maxwell's waiver of extradition would be admissible but not compel consent, though it would be a relevant factor in contested proceedings.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity