DOJ-OGR-00011607.jpg
642 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
642 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, in which a judge explains the legal considerations for an upcoming sentencing. The judge states the guideline range is 188 to 235 months but clarifies that, due to the Supreme Court's 'Booker' decision, this is only one of many factors to be considered under federal statute 18 U.S.C. 3553(a). The judge outlines these factors, including the nature of the offense, deterrence, and public safety, before concluding that the sentence must be sufficient but not greater than necessary.
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court | Government Agency |
Mentioned for its decision in the 'Booker' case, which influences sentencing procedures.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.
|
| DOJ-OGR | Government Agency |
Appears as part of the Bates number (DOJ-OGR-00011607) at the bottom right of the document, likely indicating the Dep...
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-07-22
The court is delivering a statement outlining the legal framework and factors it must consider before imposing a sentence on a defendant. This includes the guideline range, the Booker decision, and statutory requirements under 18 U.S.C. 3553(a).
Courtroom (implied)
THE COURT
defendant (unnamed)
Relationships (1)
The document is a transcript of the court explaining the legal basis for the sentence it will impose on the defendant.
Key Quotes (3)
"As I have stated, the guideline range applicable to this case is 188 to 235 months' imprisonment."Source
— THE COURT
(Stating the sentencing guideline range for the specific case being discussed.)
DOJ-OGR-00011607.jpg
Quote #1
"Under the Supreme Court's decision in a case called Booker and related cases, the guideline range is only one factor that the Court must consider in deciding the appropriate sentence."Source
— THE COURT
(Explaining that sentencing guidelines are advisory, not mandatory, based on legal precedent.)
DOJ-OGR-00011607.jpg
Quote #2
"I am required to impose a sentence sufficient, but no greater than necessary, to comply with the purposes I have just described."Source
— THE COURT
(Summarizing the legal obligation to impose a fair and just sentence that is not excessive.)
DOJ-OGR-00011607.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document