DOJ-OGR-00002355(2).jpg

746 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
4
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 746 KB
Summary

This legal document describes the contentious discovery phase of a lawsuit between Giuffre and Maxwell. It highlights that Giuffre's law firm, Boies Schiller, attempted to use the lawsuit as a 'proxy prosecution of Epstein' and sought to include a 'law enforcement' exception in the protective order to share information with the government, a proposal Maxwell rejected. The document emphasizes the vast and sensitive nature of the information exchanged, citing a related case to describe the discovery as 'hard-fought' and 'extensive'.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Giuffre Public figure / Litigant
A party in a lawsuit against Maxwell, described as a public figure who had to acknowledge some public statements were...
Epstein
Mentioned as the target of a 'proxy prosecution' via Giuffre's lawsuit.
Maxwell Litigant
A party in a lawsuit with Giuffre. Was deposed and exchanged confidential information during discovery. Rejected a pr...
Brown Litigant
Mentioned in the case citation 'Brown v. Maxwell', indicating they were a party in a related or precedent-setting case.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Boies Schiller law firm
Represented Giuffre in her lawsuit. Accused of using a litigation tactic to turn the lawsuit into a proxy prosecution...
government government agency
Mentioned in the context of Boies Schiller being 'eager to enlist the government in its campaign against Maxwell'.
law enforcement government agency
Mentioned in a proposed exception to the Protective Order that would allow confidential information to be used for 'i...

Timeline (4 events)

2019
The case of Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Cir. 2019) is cited as a reference for the nature of the discovery process.
2d Cir.
A lawsuit between Giuffre and Maxwell, which involved a bitter, hard-fought, and wide-ranging discovery process spanning over a year.
Discovery process in the Giuffre v. Maxwell case, which included large document productions, responses to interrogatories, and over thirty depositions.
Giuffre Maxwell third parties
The parties entered a stipulated Protective Order. Boies Schiller proposed adding a 'law enforcement' exception, which Maxwell rejected.

Relationships (3)

Giuffre adversarial Maxwell
They were opposing parties in a lawsuit with a 'bitter, hard-fought' discovery process.
Giuffre professional Boies Schiller
Boies Schiller is identified as Giuffre's lawyers in her lawsuit.
Giuffre adversarial Epstein
The document states that Giuffre's lawyers sought to turn her lawsuit into a 'proxy prosecution of Epstein'.

Key Quotes (4)

"hard-fought"
Source
— Court in Brown v. Maxwell (Describing the discovery process in the lawsuit between Giuffre and Maxwell.)
DOJ-OGR-00002355(2).jpg
Quote #1
"extensive"
Source
— Court in Brown v. Maxwell (Describing the discovery process in the lawsuit between Giuffre and Maxwell.)
DOJ-OGR-00002355(2).jpg
Quote #2
"thousands of pages"
Source
— Court in Brown v. Maxwell (Describing the total volume of the court file from the discovery process.)
DOJ-OGR-00002355(2).jpg
Quote #3
"CONFIDENTIAL information shall not be disclosed or used for any purpose except the preparation and trial of this case and any related matter, including but not limited to, investigations by law enforcement."
Source
— Boies Schiller (A proposed provision for the Protective Order in the Giuffre v. Maxwell case, which was rejected by Maxwell.)
DOJ-OGR-00002355(2).jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document