DOJ-OGR-00010757.jpg
930 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
8
Organizations
6
Locations
2
Events
0
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
930 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on June 29, 2022, argues for the immediate unsealing of a defendant's motion for a new trial and related documents, such as juror questionnaires. The argument is based on the First Amendment right of public access to court proceedings, which is asserted to be particularly strong when allegations of juror misconduct are involved. The document contends that the public interest in transparency is significant, especially in a high-profile case, and that no sufficient justification for sealing the documents has been provided.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Bernstein |
Mentioned as a party in the legal case citation 'Bernstein, 814 F.3d at 143–45'.
|
|
| Simone |
Mentioned as a party in the legal case citation 'United States v. Simone, 14 F.3d 833, 840'.
|
|
| Gonzalez |
Mentioned as a party in the legal case citation 'United States v. Gonzalez, 927 F. Supp. 768, 782'.
|
|
| Lugosch |
Mentioned as a party in the legal case citation 'Lugosch, 435 F.3d at 126'.
|
|
| King |
Mentioned as a party in the legal case citation 'United States v. King, 140 F.3d 76, 80, 84'.
|
|
| McDade |
Mentioned as a party in the legal case citation 'United States v. McDade, 929 F. Supp. 815, 817 n.4'.
|
Organizations (8)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States | government agency |
Mentioned as a party in several legal case citations, such as 'United States v. Simone'.
|
| CBS, Inc. | company |
Mentioned as a party in the legal case citation 'CBS, Inc. v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for Cent. Dist. of Cal.'.
|
| U.S. Dist. Ct. for Cent. Dist. of Cal. | government agency |
Mentioned as a party in the legal case citation 'CBS, Inc. v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for Cent. Dist. of Cal.'.
|
| Newsday, Inc. | company |
Mentioned as a party in the legal case citation 'In re Newsday, Inc.'.
|
| Richmond Newspaper, Inc. | company |
Mentioned as a party in the legal case citation 'Richmond Newspaper, Inc. v. Virginia'.
|
| Press-Enter. Co. | company |
Mentioned as a party in the legal case citation 'Press-Enter. Co. v. Superior Ct. of Cal.'.
|
| Superior Ct. of Cal. | government agency |
Mentioned as a party in the legal case citation 'Press-Enter. Co. v. Superior Ct. of Cal.'.
|
| DOJ | government agency |
Appears in the footer identifier 'DOJ-OGR-00010757'.
|
Locations (6)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Referenced in a case citation as 'D. Del. 1996'.
|
|
|
Referenced in a case citation as 'Cent. Dist. of Cal.'.
|
|
|
Referenced in a case citation as 'E.D. Pa. 1996'.
|
|
|
Referenced in a case citation as 'N.Y. App. Div. 1990'.
|
|
|
Referenced in the case name 'Richmond Newspaper, Inc. v. Virginia'.
|
|
|
Referenced in the case name 'Press-Enter. Co. v. Superior Ct. of Cal.'.
|
Key Quotes (5)
"immediate access where a right of access has been found."Source
— Lugosch, 435 F.3d at 126
(Quoted to support the argument that the constitutional right of access guarantees immediate access to court documents.)
DOJ-OGR-00010757.jpg
Quote #1
"[E]ach passing day may constitute a separate and cognizable infringement of the First Amendment"Source
— Lugosch, 435 F.3d at 126
(Quoted to argue that delaying access to the sealed motion causes ongoing harm.)
DOJ-OGR-00010757.jpg
Quote #2
"unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury."Source
— Lugosch, 435 F.3d at 126
(Quoted to emphasize the severity of infringing on the First Amendment right of access.)
DOJ-OGR-00010757.jpg
Quote #3
"the manner in which criminal trials are conducted,"Source
— Richmond Newspaper, Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555, 575 (1980)
(Quoted to highlight the public interest in the transparency of criminal trial procedures.)
DOJ-OGR-00010757.jpg
Quote #4
"to the adversaries [and] to the criminal justice system,"Source
— Press-Enter. Co. v. Superior Ct. of Cal.
(Quoted to describe the dual importance of voir dire in a criminal trial.)
DOJ-OGR-00010757.jpg
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document