DOJ-OGR-00019335.jpg

1.22 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal correspondence / court filing (government letter to judge)
File Size: 1.22 MB
Summary

This document is page 2 of a legal filing by the Government to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated August 21, 2020, in the criminal case against a defendant (implied Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 1:20-cr-00330). The Government opposes the defendant's request to use criminal discovery materials—specifically regarding grand jury subpoenas issued to an unnamed 'Recipient' during the Epstein investigation—in separate civil litigation. The Government argues this violates the protective order which restricts discovery material solely for the defense of the criminal action.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Alison J. Nathan Judge
Addressee of the letter; Honorable Judge presiding over the case.
Jeffrey Epstein Subject of Investigation
Government opened a grand jury investigation into him and possible co-conspirators.
The Defendant Defendant
Subject of the criminal case (implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell based on case number 1:20-cr-00330); seeking to use cri...
The Recipient Subpoena Recipient
An unnamed entity or individual who received grand jury subpoenas.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Government
The prosecution/DOJ representing the United States.
Court-1
An unnamed court that granted the Government's application to modify protective orders in April 2019.
Court-2
An unnamed court that denied the Government's application to modify protective orders.
DOJ
Department of Justice (indicated by footer DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (3 events)

April 2019
Court-1 granted Government's application and permitted sharing the order with the Recipient.
Court-1
August 2020 (approx. 3 weeks prior to letter)
Protective order entered by the Court.
Current Court
Court Defendant Government
February 2019
Government applied ex parte and under seal to modify protective orders to permit compliance with subpoenas.
Courts

Relationships (2)

Jeffrey Epstein Investigation Subject / Witness or Holder of Info The Recipient
Subpoenas issued to Recipient regarding investigation into Epstein.
The Defendant Litigant Civil Cases
Defendant seeks to use discovery materials in the Civil Cases.

Key Quotes (4)

"The Government sought such modifications to permit compliance with criminal grand jury subpoenas... issued to a certain recipient... after the Government opened a grand jury investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and his possible co-conspirators."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019335.jpg
Quote #1
"At base, the defendant’s application fundamentally misapprehends the nature and process of criminal proceedings, and it further reflects an inappropriate effort to blur the lines between the criminal discovery process and civil litigation."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019335.jpg
Quote #2
"To be clear: the purpose of criminal discovery is to enable the defendant to defend herself in the criminal action, not to provide her with a trove of materials she can mine to her advantage in civil discovery."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019335.jpg
Quote #3
"[s]hall be used by the Defendant or her Defense Counsel solely for purposes of the defense of this criminal action, and not for any civil proceeding"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019335.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document