the Recipient
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigation subject witness or holder of info |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Adversarial |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Information transfer | The Recipient turned over certain materials covered by the protective order to the Government. | N/A | View |
| 2019-04-01 | N/A | Court-1 granted Government's application and permitted sharing the order with the Recipient. | Court-1 | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001736.jpg
This is the final page (page 5) of a legal filing by the US Attorney's Office in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The Government argues that the defendant's request to use criminal discovery materials in separate civil cases should be denied because the materials are irrelevant to the civil litigation and the request attempts to bypass a protective order. The Government asserts the defendant is attempting to use these materials merely to attack the Government in a forum where it cannot respond.
DOJ-OGR-00019561.jpg
This legal document, filed on August 2, 2020, details a procedural history where the U.S. Government, in February 2019, successfully modified a civil protective order in one court (Court-1) to obtain materials for a criminal grand jury investigation. The defendant in the criminal case later learned of this through discovery. The current court is now permitting the defendant to provide information under seal to the relevant courts (Court-1 and Court-2) so they can make their own determinations about the matter.
DOJ-OGR-00019553.jpg
This is page 5 of a legal letter filed on August 21, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The Government, represented by Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss and AUSAs Comey, Moe, and Pomerantz, argues that the defendant's request to use criminal discovery materials in separate Civil Cases should be denied. The Government asserts this is an attempt to bypass protective orders and falsely accuse the Government and an unnamed 'Recipient' of malfeasance.
DOJ-OGR-00019347.jpg
This document is page 5 of a court filing dated September 16, 2020, detailing the Government's opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to modify a protective order. It outlines the history of grand jury subpoenas issued to an unnamed 'Recipient' in 2019 as part of an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirators. The text explains that the Government sought to modify civil protective orders ex parte in February 2019 to allow the Recipient to comply with these subpoenas without notifying Maxwell to preserve the investigation's integrity.
DOJ-OGR-00019335.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing by the Government to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated August 21, 2020, in the criminal case against a defendant (implied Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 1:20-cr-00330). The Government opposes the defendant's request to use criminal discovery materials—specifically regarding grand jury subpoenas issued to an unnamed 'Recipient' during the Epstein investigation—in separate civil litigation. The Government argues this violates the protective order which restricts discovery material solely for the defense of the criminal action.
DOJ-OGR-00019261.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, details a procedural history where the Government obtained materials protected by civil orders after receiving permission from one court (Court-1) but not another (Court-2). The Defendant in a related criminal case learned of this through discovery. The current court is now permitting the Defendant to provide this information under seal to the relevant courts to resolve the conflict.
Obtaining evidence
Subpoenas to the Recipient used to obtain evidence for the criminal case.
Grand Jury Investigation
Subpoenas issued regarding Jeffrey Epstein investigation.
Grand Jury Subpoenas
Demand for information connected to investigation into Epstein.
Response to Subpoenas
Advised that existing protective orders might preclude full compliance.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity