DOJ-OGR-00009213.jpg

769 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 769 KB
Summary

This legal document discusses the government's arguments in a case, referencing previous cases like United States v. Torres and United States v. Daugerdas. It focuses on whether a new trial is warranted based on juror bias and concealed personal background information, arguing that the current case is stronger than in Torres.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Ms. Maxwell
Mentioned in comparison to Juror No. 50
Justice O'Connor
Mentioned in reference to reasoning in Smith v. Phillips

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
United States Government
Plaintiff in legal cases
Second Circuit Court
Mentioned in reference to reasoning in Torres
9th Cir. Court
Dyer v. Calderon
10th Cir. Court
Burton v. Johnson

Timeline (1 events)

Mention of new trial motions and post-verdict evidentiary hearing

Key Quotes (2)

""ample discretion,""
Source
— the government (Referring to the Court's discretion)
DOJ-OGR-00009213.jpg
Quote #1
""conceal personal background material so analogous to the case on trial that bias was implied as a matter of law.""
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009213.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document