Justice O'Connor
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Justice Blackmun
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Justice Black
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Justice Blackmun
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal case discussion | The document discusses the concurring opinions from the legal case McDonough regarding juror hone... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00021771.jpg
This document is page 29 of a legal brief (Case 22-1426) filed on July 27, 2023. It argues that 'Juror 50' should have been excluded from the Maxwell case due to implied bias, specifically citing the 'average person test' and the juror's failure to disclose victimization during voir dire. The text cites multiple legal precedents (Smith v. Phillips, U.S. v. Burr) to support the claim that nondisclosure of sexual abuse victimization deprives the court of vital information.
DOJ-OGR-00009213.jpg
This legal document discusses the government's arguments in a case, referencing previous cases like United States v. Torres and United States v. Daugerdas. It focuses on whether a new trial is warranted based on juror bias and concealed personal background information, arguing that the current case is stronger than in Torres.
DOJ-OGR-00010159.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript in the case 'United States of America v. David Parse.' It records the opening of oral arguments regarding Parse's motion for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel. Defense attorney Paul Shechtman and prosecutors Nanette Davis and Stanley J. Okula, Jr. are present. While part of a larger batch of documents (indicated by the DOJ-OGR Bates stamp) often associated with Epstein-related releases, the text specifically concerns the trial of David Parse.
DOJ-OGR-00009725.jpg
This document page is from a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on March 11, 2022. It presents legal arguments regarding juror misconduct and the standard for obtaining a new trial, citing the Supreme Court case *McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood*. The text quotes concurring opinions by Justices Blackmun and Brennan to argue that a juror's intentional dishonesty is not strictly required to order a post-trial hearing on bias.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017397.jpg
This document appears to be a page (page 310) from a manuscript or book draft, possibly written by Jeffrey Epstein or a ghostwriter, given the 'House Oversight' stamp often associated with the Epstein investigation documents. The text discusses the separation of church and state, criticizing the intrusion of religious 'values' into politics, specifically regarding abortion and gay rights, and referencing the 1984 and 2012 elections. It also includes a personal reflection on the author's upbringing, admitting to past homophobia that was cultural rather than religious, and contrasting it with the attitudes of modern youth.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity